Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(stageExecution): In evaluable variable stage restart scenario variables are not cleaned properly (#16) #4307

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 12, 2022

Conversation

OscarMichelH
Copy link
Member

Issue: Expression evaluates the previous data when upstream stage(Manual Judgement) is restarted (or other restar case).
image

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Execute the pipeline and choose Continue at the Manual Judgement stage. Upon completion note that the status variable inside "Evaluate Variables" was evaluated to 'success'; this is correct.

  2. Execute the pipeline again and when it reaches the Manual Judgment, wait 1 min for it to timeout or stop manually the judgment. Upon timeout, note that the status variable inside "Evaluate Variables" was evaluated to 'failed'; again this is correct.

  3. Click on the failed Manual Judgment stage and choose Actions -> Restart Manual Judgement from the drop down.
    The pipeline will execute. Choose Continue for the Manual Judgement. Upon completion note that the status variable inside "Evaluate Variables" has still evaluated to 'failed'; this is incorrect as the deploy stage was successful.

Solution:
EvaluateVariablesStage does not have logic created for restart scenarios, so the values for the expression previously executed are preserved.

prepareStageForRestart function for EvaluateVariablesStage object needs clear the values for a new execution.

Scenario whit approach applied:

image

Copy link
Contributor

@kkotula kkotula left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dogonthehorizon dogonthehorizon added the ready to merge Approved and ready for merge label Oct 12, 2022
@mergify mergify bot added the auto merged Merged automatically by a bot label Oct 12, 2022
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 900a992 into spinnaker:master Oct 12, 2022
@link108
Copy link
Member

link108 commented Nov 8, 2022

@Mergifyio backport release-1.27.x release-1.28.x release-1.29.x

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 8, 2022

link108 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
…iables are not cleaned properly (#16) (backport #4307) (#4325)

Co-authored-by: Oscar Michel Herrera <oscarmichelh@gmail.com>
link108 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
…iables are not cleaned properly (#16) (backport #4307) (#4326)

Co-authored-by: Oscar Michel Herrera <oscarmichelh@gmail.com>
link108 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
…iables are not cleaned properly (#16) (backport #4307) (#4327)

Co-authored-by: Oscar Michel Herrera <oscarmichelh@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto merged Merged automatically by a bot ready to merge Approved and ready for merge target-release/1.30
Projects
None yet
5 participants