Update beam-runners-core-construction-java, ... to 2.49.0

[scala-steward]

About this PR

📦 Updates

• org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-construction-java
• org.apache.beam:beam-runners-direct-java
• org.apache.beam:beam-runners-flink-1.16
• org.apache.beam:beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java
• org.apache.beam:beam-runners-spark-3
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-core
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-extensions-avro
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-extensions-google-cloud-platform-core
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-extensions-protobuf
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-extensions-sketching
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-extensions-sorter
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-extensions-sql
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-extensions-zetasketch
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-hadoop-common
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-hadoop-format
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-jdbc
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-neo4j
• org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-redis

from 2.48.0 to 2.49.0

Usage

✅ Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

🔍 Files still referring to the old version number

The following files still refer to the old version number (2.48.0).
You might want to review and update them manually.

build.sbt
site/src/main/paradox/releases/Apache-Beam.md

⚙ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.apache.beam" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.apache.beam" }
}]

^{labels: library-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-minor, old-version-remains, commit-count:1}

[RustedBones]

I'm not sure we should provide this as default.

If user rely on AvroHugger, they should probably defined their own AvroDatumFactory as this one. I think now, most avro IOs will also require a custom DatumReaderFactory/DatumWriterFactory because of invalid schema loading.

[RustedBones]

It was never possible to use the avro hugger generated classes in the scio SpecificRecordIO because beam automatically calls ReflectData.get().getSchema(recordClass) that throws an AvroRuntimeException here

[RustedBones]

I'd be more in favor of this change for the avro coders: e1dd5ea

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4927 (052722a) into main (ee85495) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 052722a differs from pull request most recent head 7273d4f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7273d4f to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4927      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.96%   62.98%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         282      282              
  Lines       10641    10648       +7     
  Branches      779      789      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         6700     6707       +7     
  Misses       3941     3941              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...com/spotify/scio/coders/instances/AvroCoders.scala	86.66% <100.00%> (+2.45%)	⬆️