-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 342
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is it possible to use warp-ctc instead? #28
Comments
We are studying the validity of the comparisons they presented, specifically the linear correlation between time and N for Eesen. |
Parallelization is still an issue for eesen, which needs to be addressed X. 在 2016/1/18 23:37, Yajie Miao 写道:
|
Any news/results about it? |
We've looked at it, and it does not seem to be that straightforward. Baidu's code is only CTC (no LSTM) so one would need to put a few more things in place before it'll be usable. We also had difficulty understanding the published comparisons. Yajie, I know you're traveling - maybe you could comment some more? |
The benchmark in https://github.com/baidu-research/warp-ctc is much faster than eesen's implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: