Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to use warp-ctc instead? #28

Open
tianshuo opened this issue Jan 18, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Is it possible to use warp-ctc instead? #28

tianshuo opened this issue Jan 18, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@tianshuo
Copy link

The benchmark in https://github.com/baidu-research/warp-ctc is much faster than eesen's implementation.

@yajiemiao
Copy link
Collaborator

We are studying the validity of the comparisons they presented, specifically the linear correlation between time and N for Eesen.

@naxingyu
Copy link
Contributor

Parallelization is still an issue for eesen, which needs to be addressed
if it is be used massively.

X.

在 2016/1/18 23:37, Yajie Miao 写道:

We are studying the validity of the comparisons they presented,
specifically the linear correlation between time and N for Eesen.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28 (comment).

@geffy
Copy link

geffy commented Apr 6, 2016

Any news/results about it?

@fmetze
Copy link
Contributor

fmetze commented Apr 12, 2016

We've looked at it, and it does not seem to be that straightforward. Baidu's code is only CTC (no LSTM) so one would need to put a few more things in place before it'll be usable. We also had difficulty understanding the published comparisons. Yajie, I know you're traveling - maybe you could comment some more?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants