Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Another characterization of rings of weak dimension <= 1
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Namely, that the local rings are valuation rings
  • Loading branch information
aisejohan committed Oct 25, 2014
1 parent 2f4d7fc commit aeebd74
Showing 1 changed file with 31 additions and 4 deletions.
35 changes: 31 additions & 4 deletions more-algebra.tex
Expand Up @@ -3263,7 +3263,7 @@ \section{Content ideals}
$u(x) \not \in I'N$. Since $I/I'$ is a nonzero finite $A$-module
(Lemma \ref{lemma-content-finitely-generated}) there is a nonzero map
$\chi : I/I' \to A/\mathfrak m$ of $A$-modules
by Nakayama's lemma (Algebra, Lemma \ref{lemma-NAK}).
by Nakayama's lemma (Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-NAK}).
Since $I$ is the content ideal of $x$ we see that
$x \not \in I''M$ where $I'' = \Ker(\chi)$.
Hence $x$ is not in the kernel of the map
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -17605,7 +17605,8 @@ \section{Weakly \'etale ring maps}
\item $A$ has weak dimension $\leq 1$,
\item every ideal of $A$ is flat,
\item every finitely generated ideal of $A$ is flat,
\item every submodule of a flat $A$-module is flat.
\item every submodule of a flat $A$-module is flat, and
\item every local ring of $A$ is a valuation ring.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

Expand All @@ -17626,7 +17627,7 @@ \section{Weakly \'etale ring maps}
Every ideal is the union of the finitely generated ideals
contained in it. Hence (3) implies (2) by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-colimit-flat}.
Thus (3) and (2) are equivalent.
Thus (3) $\Leftrightarrow$ (2).

\medskip\noindent
Assume (2). Suppose that $N \subset M$ with $M$ a flat $A$-module.
Expand All @@ -17641,7 +17642,33 @@ \section{Weakly \'etale ring maps}
the module $N$ has a finite filtration by the submodules
$R^{\oplus j} \cap N$ whose subquotients are ideals.
By (2) these ideals are flat and hence $N$ is flat by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-ses}.
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-ses}. Thus (2) $\Rightarrow$ (4).

\medskip\noindent
Assume $A$ satisfies (1) and let $\mathfrak p \subset A$ be a
prime ideal. By
Lemmas \ref{lemma-when-weakly-etale} and \ref{lemma-weak-dimension-goes-up}
we see that $A_\mathfrak p$ satisfies (1). We will show $A$ is a valuation ring
if $A$ is a local ring satisfying (3). Let $f \in \mathfrak m$
be a nonzero element. Then $(f)$ is a flat nonzero module generated by
one element. Hence it is a free $A$-module by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-finite-flat-local}.
It follows that $f$ is a nonzerodivisor and $A$ is a domain.
If $I \subset A$ is a finitely generated ideal, then we similarly
see that $I$ is a finite free $A$-module, hence (by considering the
rank) free of rank $1$ and $I$ is a principal ideal. Thus $A$ is a
valuation ring by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-characterize-valuation-ring}.
Thus (1) $\Rightarrow$ (5).

\medskip\noindent
Assume (5). Let $I \subset A$ be a finitely generated ideal.
Then $I_\mathfrak p \subset A_\mathfrak p$ is a finitely generated ideal
in a valuation ring, hence principal
(Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-characterize-valuation-ring}), hence flat.
Thus $I$ is flat by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-localization}.
Thus (5) $\Rightarrow$ (3). This finishes the proof of the lemma.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit aeebd74

Please sign in to comment.