Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce mcmc_recover_intervals #57

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 13, 2016
Merged

Introduce mcmc_recover_intervals #57

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 13, 2016

Conversation

jgabry
Copy link
Member

@jgabry jgabry commented Dec 12, 2016

For plotting a comparison of MCMC estimates and "true" parameter values (values used to simulate the data) to check that they are (approximately) recovered.

closes #56

@jgabry jgabry added the feature label Dec 12, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 12, 2016

Current coverage is 100% (diff: 100%)

Merging #57 into master will not change coverage

@@           master    #57   diff @@
====================================
  Files          25     26     +1   
  Lines        2681   2766    +85   
  Methods         0      0          
  Messages        0      0          
  Branches        0      0          
====================================
+ Hits         2681   2766    +85   
  Misses          0      0          
  Partials        0      0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 8480125...aece592

@jgabry jgabry merged commit b55afb8 into master Dec 13, 2016
@jgabry
Copy link
Member Author

jgabry commented Dec 13, 2016

@ericnovik check out this new mcmc_recover_intervals function

@jgabry jgabry deleted the mcmc_recover branch December 13, 2016 00:44
@jgabry jgabry added the new plot label Aug 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

plots to facilitate comparing mcmc estimates to "true" parameter values
2 participants