Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Command scopes fixes: #2061, #2072, #2075 #2129

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2017

Conversation

alwx
Copy link
Contributor

@alwx alwx commented Oct 12, 2017

Fixes #2061, #2072, #2075

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "StatusIm",
"interface": "reagent",
"androidHost": "localhost",
"androidHost": "10.0.3.2",
Copy link
Contributor

@yenda yenda Oct 12, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't include these files

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's still in progress, it doesn't suppose to be merged right now

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

my bad, makes me realize the status we usually put in the PR description (ready/wip) is redundant with the column in zenhub

@yenda
Copy link
Contributor

yenda commented Oct 12, 2017

Is this going to be squashed in the other PR ? Why is it in a separate PR ?

@alwx alwx merged this pull request into feature/command-scopes Oct 13, 2017
alwx added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2017
alwx added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2017
rasom pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2017
alwx added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2017
@rasom rasom deleted the bug/command-scopes-fixes branch November 13, 2017 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants