Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update fs-extra to version 2.1.0 🚀 #124

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

fs-extra just published its new version 2.1.0.

State Update 🚀
Dependency fs-extra
New version 2.1.0
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of fs-extra.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 174 commits .

  • 90b3609 2.1.0
  • 6ebcb9c Update CHANGELOG
  • efe0d80 Merge pull request #378 from jdalton/move-check
  • 8d978db Don't move when source and dest paths are the same.
  • cf2c50d Merge pull request #386 from jprichardson/changelog
  • 4db96c5 Update CHANGELOG
  • 1f30161 Merge pull request #384 from jprichardson/docs-cleanup-async-methods
  • 83a6190 docs: Refactor remove exmaple to use remove instead of removeSync
  • 936011e docs: Refactor remove and removeSync parameter name
  • fc5fca9 docs: Refactor docs to include parameters type
  • e46b820 Merge pull request #383 from jprichardson/docs-refactor-readJson-example
  • a4f6481 docs/readJson.md: Refactor example for readJson method, refactor move and moveSync tests descriptions
  • b5c72dc Merge pull request #382 from jprichardson/docs-split-out-sync-methods
  • 10756de docs: Refactor readJsonSync example
  • 02c2a62 Docs: Split out sync methods

There are 174 commits in total. See the full diff.


✨ Try the all new Greenkeeper GitHub Integration ✨
With Integrations first-class bot support landed on GitHub and we’ve rewritten Greenkeeper to take full advantage of it. Simpler setup, fewer pull-requests, faster than ever.

Screencast

Try it today. Free for private repositories during beta.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 15, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling a321419 on greenkeeper-fs-extra-2.1.0 into a73f00e on master.

@stefanjudis stefanjudis closed this Oct 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants