feat: Additional ignores for HTML IDREF properties

[nschonni]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+2.2%) to 100.0% when pulling 3f9b2c6 on nschonni:ignore-idrefs into 7df2080 on streetsidesoftware:master.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #437 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #437   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.42%   98.42%           
=======================================
  Files          85       85           
  Lines        3609     3609           
  Branches      604      604           
=======================================
  Hits         3552     3552           
  Misses         54       54           
  Partials        3        3           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7df2080...3f9b2c6. Read the comment docs.

[Jason3S]

would you define these as patterns in html/cspell-ext.json like found in python/cspell-ext.json?

Then then can be turned on/off and even overridden in case they do not perform so well.

[nschonni]

OK, I also wasn't sure if these should be a named regex like "href"

[Jason3S]

Using named patterns has some advantages.

1. It becomes easier to know what it should do (assuming it is a good name).
2. It can be overridden easily with an improved pattern.

[nschonni]

OK, I can see it being a combine regex, maybe called "IDRef" or something similar, as that's what these represent. Do you have a preference to doing that here and using the named regex in this place, or just shifting it to cspell-dicts?

[Jason3S]

I would rather have them defined in cspell-dict/packages/html/cspell-ext.json. That way they can be changed independently from the tool.

[nschonni]

Closing in favour of streetsidesoftware/cspell-dicts#252