Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate a TypeScript Definition file as part of the build #1692

Closed
ritch opened this issue Sep 22, 2015 · 99 comments
Closed

Generate a TypeScript Definition file as part of the build #1692

ritch opened this issue Sep 22, 2015 · 99 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ritch
Copy link
Member

ritch commented Sep 22, 2015

This should be possible using either the JSDoc comments or remoting metadata.

See #1415 for original question that sparked this feature request.

@ritch ritch added the feature label Sep 22, 2015
@ritch ritch changed the title Generate a Type Script Definition file as part of the build Generate a TypeScript Definition file as part of the build Sep 22, 2015
@ritch ritch self-assigned this Sep 22, 2015
@kierer
Copy link

kierer commented Sep 22, 2015

+1

25 similar comments
@rob3c
Copy link

rob3c commented Sep 22, 2015

+1

@lambrojos
Copy link

+1

@gustavomick
Copy link

+1

@proreact-mj
Copy link

+1

@dregre
Copy link

dregre commented Oct 4, 2015

+1

@vargo
Copy link

vargo commented Oct 6, 2015

+1

@GauSim
Copy link

GauSim commented Oct 19, 2015

+1

@SynerG
Copy link

SynerG commented Oct 20, 2015

+1

@pmoelgaard
Copy link

+1

@nitintutlani
Copy link

+1

@FoysalOsmany
Copy link

+1

@malotur
Copy link

malotur commented Oct 31, 2015

+1

@xiangmeng4geo
Copy link

+1

@enicholson
Copy link

+1

@dtomasi
Copy link

dtomasi commented Nov 16, 2015

+1

@tuomastanner
Copy link

+1

@Yaojian
Copy link

Yaojian commented Nov 27, 2015

+1

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 1, 2015

+1

@saaa-hsjgrobler
Copy link

+1

@jay-soeur
Copy link

+1

@drywolf
Copy link

drywolf commented Dec 23, 2015

+1

@rodamora
Copy link

+1

@dansterrett
Copy link

+1

@cajoy
Copy link

cajoy commented Jan 13, 2016

+1

@bwillacker
Copy link

+1

@hkashlan
Copy link

hkashlan commented Sep 7, 2016

+1

2 similar comments
@morentin
Copy link

morentin commented Sep 8, 2016

+1

@jcroldan
Copy link

+1

@M-jerez
Copy link

M-jerez commented Sep 10, 2016

@ritch @ALL, microsoft is working On dts-gen, that might help to anyone working On this https://github.com/Microsoft/dts-gen

@jorgeramos
Copy link

+1

@raymondfeng
Copy link
Member

@M-jerez Good pointer. I'll take a look.

BTW, our tooling team has built the following plugin for Visual Studio code:

https://github.com/IBM-Bluemix/vscode-extension-api-connect

It generates the following typescript d.ts file:

apiConnect.d.ts.txt

@shairez
Copy link

shairez commented Sep 17, 2016

+1

@jeffbcross
Copy link

Stay out of this, @shairez

@jcroldan
Copy link

Hi,

i tried Qeti's fork of loopback-sdk-angular & loopback-sdk-angular-cli who generates typescript files.

You can take a look here:
https://github.com/qeti/loopback-sdk-angular
https://github.com/Qeti/loopback-sdk-angular-cli

@sylvaindumont
Copy link
Contributor

Based on the work on the qeti fork, there is :
https://github.com/mean-expert-official/loopback-sdk-builder

@lailavinson
Copy link

+1

1 similar comment
@sushilks
Copy link

+1

@microsoftly
Copy link

+1

@cgole cgole removed the #tob label Jan 7, 2017
@jordialborch
Copy link

+1

4 similar comments
@TangMonk
Copy link

TangMonk commented Feb 6, 2017

+1

@AnthonyLabaere
Copy link

+1

@ShimiBaliti
Copy link

+1

@dasoli
Copy link

dasoli commented Mar 15, 2017

+1

@dasoli
Copy link

dasoli commented Mar 15, 2017

I dont know why everytime the same people rate down the post, Beeman or somebody else - feel free to tell us why you don't like that people want to keep this issue alive?

@beeman
Copy link
Contributor

beeman commented Mar 15, 2017

@dasoli it's annoying to see just an +1 added to an issue. Everybody gets notified without any news, that kind of defeats the purpose of keeping the issue alive because nothing changed.

If you want to express that you'd like to see this issue solved you can use the thumbs up icon on the opening post.

Edit: it got mentioned here but since almost nobody tends to read they just blindly keep on adding +1's, triggering a reaction with others... :)

@geminiyellow
Copy link

@beeman no no, Reactions not send a notification, single comment dose. that means, everybody want to know the status about this issues.they push this project move. if you dont like it, you can set no watch , or, if maintainer dont like it, they can lock this issue.

@bdharrington7
Copy link

Sooo given the number of +1's (both reactions and comments) is this being prioritized at all?

@zbarbuto
Copy link
Member

zbarbuto commented Apr 11, 2017

@bdharrington7 Given that the Loopback SDK Builder exists, probably not.

@bdharrington7
Copy link

@zbarbuto what if I don't want to use Angular?

@movibe
Copy link

movibe commented Sep 18, 2017

+1

@bajtos
Copy link
Member

bajtos commented Nov 12, 2019

LoopBack version 3 is in LTS, we won't be adding any new features.

@bajtos bajtos closed this as completed Nov 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests