Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Heap-buffer-overflow in sse-motion.cc: ff_hevc_put_hevc_qpel_h_2_v_1_sse #335

Closed
fdu-sec opened this issue Oct 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Heap-buffer-overflow in sse-motion.cc: ff_hevc_put_hevc_qpel_h_2_v_1_sse #335

fdu-sec opened this issue Oct 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
fix available

Comments

@fdu-sec
Copy link

fdu-sec commented Oct 10, 2022

Description

Heap-buffer-overflow (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x2831a1) in ff_hevc_put_hevc_qpel_h_2_v_1_sse(short*, long, unsigned char const*, long, int, int, short*)

Version

$ ./dec265 -h
 dec265  v1.0.8
--------------
usage: dec265 [options] videofile.bin
The video file must be a raw bitstream, or a stream with NAL units (option -n).

options:
  -q, --quiet       do not show decoded image
  -t, --threads N   set number of worker threads (0 - no threading)
  -c, --check-hash  perform hash check
  -n, --nal         input is a stream with 4-byte length prefixed NAL units
  -f, --frames N    set number of frames to process
  -o, --output      write YUV reconstruction
  -d, --dump        dump headers
  -0, --noaccel     do not use any accelerated code (SSE)
  -v, --verbose     increase verbosity level (up to 3 times)
  -L, --no-logging  disable logging
  -B, --write-bytestream FILENAME  write raw bytestream (from NAL input)
  -m, --measure YUV compute PSNRs relative to reference YUV
  -T, --highest-TID select highest temporal sublayer to decode
      --disable-deblocking   disable deblocking filter
      --disable-sao          disable sample-adaptive offset filter
  -h, --help        show help

Replay

git clone https://github.com/strukturag/libde265.git
cd libde265
mkdir build
cd build
cmake ../ -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-fsanitize=address"
make -j$(nproc)
./dec265/dec265 poc1

ASAN

WARNING: non-existing PPS referenced
WARNING: non-existing PPS referenced
WARNING: CTB outside of image area (concealing stream error...)
WARNING: slice header invalid
=================================================================
==8080==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7f80809038b9 at pc 0x7f807f61d1a2 bp 0x7fff6fd46c30 sp 0x7fff6fd46c20
READ of size 16 at 0x7f80809038b9 thread T0
    #0 0x7f807f61d1a1 in ff_hevc_put_hevc_qpel_h_2_v_1_sse(short*, long, unsigned char const*, long, int, int, short*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x2831a1)
    #1 0x7f807f51137d in acceleration_functions::put_hevc_qpel(short*, long, void const*, long, int, int, short*, int, int, int) const (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x17737d)
    #2 0x7f807f5128ab in void mc_luma<unsigned char>(base_context const*, seq_parameter_set const*, int, int, int, int, short*, int, unsigned char const*, int, int, int, int) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1788ab)
    #3 0x7f807f503995 in generate_inter_prediction_samples(base_context*, slice_segment_header const*, de265_image*, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, PBMotion const*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x169995)
    #4 0x7f807f51090f in decode_prediction_unit(base_context*, slice_segment_header const*, de265_image*, PBMotionCoding const&, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x17690f)
    #5 0x7f807f54b7e3 in read_prediction_unit(thread_context*, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1b17e3)
    #6 0x7f807f54d264 in read_coding_unit(thread_context*, int, int, int, int) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1b3264)
    #7 0x7f807f54e250 in read_coding_quadtree(thread_context*, int, int, int, int) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1b4250)
    #8 0x7f807f54e218 in read_coding_quadtree(thread_context*, int, int, int, int) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1b4218)
    #9 0x7f807f54e218 in read_coding_quadtree(thread_context*, int, int, int, int) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1b4218)
    #10 0x7f807f54e218 in read_coding_quadtree(thread_context*, int, int, int, int) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1b4218)
    #11 0x7f807f545726 in read_coding_tree_unit(thread_context*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1ab726)
    #12 0x7f807f54e9ea in decode_substream(thread_context*, bool, bool) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1b49ea)
    #13 0x7f807f55070f in read_slice_segment_data(thread_context*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1b670f)
    #14 0x7f807f4af6d2 in decoder_context::decode_slice_unit_sequential(image_unit*, slice_unit*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1156d2)
    #15 0x7f807f4afec1 in decoder_context::decode_slice_unit_parallel(image_unit*, slice_unit*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x115ec1)
    #16 0x7f807f4aec0f in decoder_context::decode_some(bool*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x114c0f)
    #17 0x7f807f4ae93d in decoder_context::read_slice_NAL(bitreader&, NAL_unit*, nal_header&) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x11493d)
    #18 0x7f807f4b143e in decoder_context::decode_NAL(NAL_unit*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x11743e)
    #19 0x7f807f4b1ab3 in decoder_context::decode(int*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x117ab3)
    #20 0x7f807f498e95 in de265_decode (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0xfee95)
    #21 0x55c0d6940bc9 in main (/libde265/build/dec265/dec265+0x6bc9)
    #22 0x7f807efcac86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21c86)
    #23 0x55c0d693e9b9 in _start (/libde265/build/dec265/dec265+0x49b9)

0x7f80809038b9 is located 169 bytes to the right of 131088-byte region [0x7f80808e3800,0x7f8080903810)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x7f807f9c1790 in posix_memalign (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdf790)
    #1 0x7f807f4ea1cb in ALLOC_ALIGNED(unsigned long, unsigned long) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1501cb)
    #2 0x7f807f4ea92a in de265_image_get_buffer(void*, de265_image_spec*, de265_image*, void*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x15092a)
    #3 0x7f807f4ecd1a in de265_image::alloc_image(int, int, de265_chroma, std::shared_ptr<seq_parameter_set const>, bool, decoder_context*, long, void*, bool) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x152d1a)
    #4 0x7f807f4d10cc in decoded_picture_buffer::new_image(std::shared_ptr<seq_parameter_set const>, decoder_context*, long, void*, bool) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x1370cc)
    #5 0x7f807f4b2824 in decoder_context::generate_unavailable_reference_picture(seq_parameter_set const*, int, bool) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x118824)
    #6 0x7f807f4b57f5 in decoder_context::process_reference_picture_set(slice_segment_header*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x11b7f5)
    #7 0x7f807f4b8d70 in decoder_context::process_slice_segment_header(slice_segment_header*, de265_error*, long, nal_header*, void*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x11ed70)
    #8 0x7f807f4ae246 in decoder_context::read_slice_NAL(bitreader&, NAL_unit*, nal_header&) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x114246)
    #9 0x7f807f4b143e in decoder_context::decode_NAL(NAL_unit*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x11743e)
    #10 0x7f807f4b1ab3 in decoder_context::decode(int*) (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x117ab3)
    #11 0x7f807f498e95 in de265_decode (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0xfee95)
    #12 0x55c0d6940bc9 in main (/libde265/build/dec265/dec265+0x6bc9)
    #13 0x7f807efcac86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21c86)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow (/libde265/build/libde265/liblibde265.so+0x2831a1) in ff_hevc_put_hevc_qpel_h_2_v_1_sse(short*, long, unsigned char const*, long, int, int, short*)
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x0ff0901186c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0ff0901186d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0ff0901186e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0ff0901186f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0ff090118700: 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
=>0x0ff090118710: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa[fa]fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x0ff090118720: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x0ff090118730: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x0ff090118740: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x0ff090118750: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x0ff090118760: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==8080==ABORTING

POC

https://github.com/FDU-Sec/poc/blob/main/libde265/poc1

Environment

Ubuntu 16.04
Clang 10.0.1
gcc 5.5
@coldtobi
Copy link

According to Debian this is CVE-2022-43240

coldtobi pushed a commit to coldtobi/libde265 that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2022
Use the sps from the image
36391cd 
(as e.g mc_chroma is using the sps to determine
picture properties, like pic_width_in_luma_samples
and pic_height_in_luma_samples, I *think* this is
more correct.

This PR is for discussion. (See strukturag#345.)
It makes the failures go away, but that does not mean it's correct :)

The following poc will be stop failing if (only) this
patch is applied:

 - poc2  strukturag#336 - CVE-2022-43238
 - poc4  strukturag#338 - CVE-2022-43241
 - poc6-1, poc6-2 strukturag#340 - CVE-2022-43242
 - poc7-1, poc7-2  strukturag#341 - CVE-2022-43239
 - poc8-1 strukturag#342 - CVE-2022-43244
 - poc9-3 strukturag#343 - CVE-2022-43236
 - poc10-2, poc10-3 strukturag#344 - CVE-2022-43237
 - poc16 strukturag#350
 - poc19 strukturag#353

The following are still failing if only this patch is
applied, but they stop failing if strukturag#365 is applied as well, but will
still fail with ONLY strukturag#365 applied (IOW, both are needed)

 - poc1  strukturag#335 - CVE-2022-43240
 - poc3  strukturag#337 - CVE-2022-43235
 - poc5   strukturag#339 - CVE-2022-43423
 - poc9-1,poc9-2, poc9-4  strukturag#343 - CVE-2022-43236
 - poc14  strukturag#348 - CVE-2022-43253
 - poc15  strukturag#349 - CVE-2022-43248
 - poc17-1, poc17-2  strukturag#351
 - poc18 strukturag#352 - CVE-2022-43245
@coldtobi coldtobi mentioned this issue Dec 12, 2022
Open
@farindk
Copy link
Contributor

farindk commented Jan 24, 2023

Should be fixed by #374

@farindk farindk closed this as completed Jan 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
fix available
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@farindk @coldtobi @fdu-sec