BTC: 2020-09-22 #13
Merged
BTC: 2020-09-22 #13
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There is no change in behavior on the P2P network.
SetCommonVersion() is already called from the VERSION message handler. There is no change in behavior on the P2P network.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
0d04784 Refactor the functional test (Gleb Naumenko) 83ad65f Address nits in ADDR caching (Gleb Naumenko) 81b00f8 Add indexing ADDR cache by local socket addr (Gleb Naumenko) 42ec558 Justify the choice of ADDR cache lifetime (Gleb Naumenko) Pull request description: This is a follow-up on #18991 which does 3 things: - improves privacy of a node listening to multiple addresses via adding cache index by local socket addr (suggested [here](bitcoin/bitcoin#18991 (comment))) - documents on the choice of 24h cache lifetime - addresses nits from #18991 ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 0d04784 vasild: ACK 0d04784 jonatack: Code review ACK 0d04784 Tree-SHA512: bb65a34dd1ce2811186d3e4469bc33e8399cebaaa494ce13041c7cff23275870e4176a719f7a72f8d779c49f8b2344bf4fa1aeb3ea4e2626d5ae76514f00a750
8258c4c test: some sanity checks for consensus logic (Anthony Towns) e47ad37 test: basic signet tests (Karl-Johan Alm) 4c189ab test: add small signet fuzzer (practicalswift) ec9b25d test: signet network selection tests (Karl-Johan Alm) 3efe298 signet: hard-coded parameters for Signet Global Network VI (2020-09-07) (Karl-Johan Alm) c7898bc qt: update QT to support signet network (Karl-Johan Alm) a8de47a consensus: add signet validation (Karl-Johan Alm) e8990f1 add signet chain and accompanying parameters (Karl-Johan Alm) 404682b add signet basic support (signet.cpp) (Karl-Johan Alm) a2147d7 validation: move GetWitnessCommitmentIndex to consensus/validation (Karl-Johan Alm) Pull request description: This PR is a part of BIP-325 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0325.mediawiki), and is a sub-PR of #16411. * Signet consensus (this) * Signet RPC tools (pending) * Signet utility scripts (contrib/signet) (pending) ACKs for top commit: jonatack: re-ACK 8258c4c per `git diff dbeea65 8258c4c`, only change since last review is updated `-signet*` config option naming. fjahr: re-ACK 8258c4c laanwj: ACK 8258c4c MarcoFalke: Approach ACK 8258c4c 🌵 Tree-SHA512: 5d158add96755910837feafa8214e13695b769a6aec3a2da753cf672618bef377fac43b0f4b772a87b25dd9f0c1c9b29f2789785d7a7d47a155cdcf48f7c975d
ddefb5c p2p: Use the greatest common version in peer logic (Hennadii Stepanov) e084d45 p2p: Remove SetCommonVersion() from VERACK handler (Hennadii Stepanov) 8d20267 refactor: Rename local variable nSendVersion (Hennadii Stepanov) e9a6d8b p2p: Unify Send and Receive protocol versions (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: On master (6fef85b) `CNode` has two members to keep protocol version: - `nRecvVersion` for received messages - `nSendVersion` for messages to send After exchanging with `VERSION` and `VERACK` messages via protocol version `INIT_PROTO_VERSION`, both nodes set `nRecvVersion` _and_ `nSendVersion` to _the same_ value which is the greatest common protocol version. This PR: - replaces two `CNode` members, `nRecvVersion` `nSendVersion`, with `m_greatest_common_version` - removes duplicated getter and setter There is no change in behavior on the P2P network. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: ACK ddefb5c naumenkogs: ACK ddefb5c fjahr: Code review ACK ddefb5c amitiuttarwar: code review but untested ACK ddefb5c benthecarman: utACK `ddefb5c` Tree-SHA512: 5305538dbaa5426b923b0afd20bdef4f248d310855d1d78427210c00716c67b7cb691515c421716b6157913e453076e293b10ff5fd2cd26a8e5375d42da7809d
decryp2kanon
force-pushed
the
btc_200922
branch
from
60a8898
to
6b57110
Compare
decryp2kanon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2020
fa56d56 fuzz: Properly initialize PrecomputedTransactionData (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Fixes: ``` script_flags: script/interpreter.cpp:1512: bool SignatureHashSchnorr(uint256 &, const ScriptExecutionData &, const T &, uint32_t, uint8_t, SigVersion, const PrecomputedTransactionData &) [T = CTransaction]: Assertion `cache.m_bip341_taproot_ready && cache.m_spent_outputs_ready' failed. ==34989== ERROR: libFuzzer: deadly signal #0 0x55e90077ff11 in __sanitizer_print_stack_trace (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x20cf11) #1 0x55e9006cb068 in fuzzer::PrintStackTrace() (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x158068) #2 0x55e9006b01b3 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::CrashCallback() (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x13d1b3) #3 0x7f6fb89383bf (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x153bf) #4 0x7f6fb855018a in raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x4618a) #5 0x7f6fb852f858 in abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x25858) #6 0x7f6fb852f728 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x25728) #7 0x7f6fb8540f35 in __assert_fail (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x36f35) #8 0x55e9008275bd in bool SignatureHashSchnorr<CTransaction>(uint256&, ScriptExecutionData const&, CTransaction const&, unsigned int, unsigned char, SigVersion, PrecomputedTransactionData const&) /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1512:5 #9 0x55e900825a3f in GenericTransactionSignatureChecker<CTransaction>::CheckSchnorrSignature(Span<unsigned char const>, Span<unsigned char const>, SigVersion, ScriptExecutionData const&, ScriptError_t*) const /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1699:10 #10 0x55e900832503 in VerifyWitnessProgram(CScriptWitness const&, int, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, unsigned int, BaseSignatureChecker const&, ScriptError_t*, bool) /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1900:26 #11 0x55e90082ecb5 in VerifyScript(CScript const&, CScript const&, CScriptWitness const*, unsigned int, BaseSignatureChecker const&, ScriptError_t*) /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1977:18 #12 0x55e9007a9b61 in test_one_input(std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&) /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags.cpp:51:30 #13 0x55e9007d0b49 in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp:36:5 #14 0x55e9006b1871 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x13e871) #15 0x55e9006b0fb5 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::RunOne(unsigned char const*, unsigned long, bool, fuzzer::InputInfo*, bool*) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x13dfb5) #16 0x55e9006b38d7 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ReadAndExecuteSeedCorpora(std::__Fuzzer::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, fuzzer::fuzzer_allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile> >&) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x1408d7) #17 0x55e9006b3c39 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::Loop(std::__Fuzzer::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, fuzzer::fuzzer_allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile> >&) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x140c39) #18 0x55e9006a290e in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x12f90e) #19 0x55e9006cb752 in main (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x158752) #20 0x7f6fb85310b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2) #21 0x55e9006776ad in _start (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x1046ad) ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK fa56d56 Tree-SHA512: 5637b0a0d982360df32d8cd39e913395967af02ec746508fc5f2fd649695c58bfaaf18ef76f4ca9da764d34fdd63dfe188317dd41b2ed57534bd4055a05ae870
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.