Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

Index argo facets starting "SW" with the same code used by SearchWorks for those facets #992

Closed
5 of 7 tasks
ndushay opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
5 of 7 tasks
Assignees

Comments

@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor

ndushay commented Sep 14, 2023

Use stanford_mods code to index the Argo facets that are supposed to be akin to SearchWorks facets. There is an exemplar PR #993. I think a single PR for all the rest of the facets below is fine, but that's up to you.

The below is condensed from https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s4gQcPEY_YPGrDOFXQQ1IbRYBc3AaKGRIPW1FFw46G0/, where I traced Argo and SearchWorks for catalog config information for Solr facet field names and then chased indexing code in searchworks_traject_indexer to get to the methods used to populate the SearchWorks facet fields. See also the epic sul-dlss/argo#3168 for more info.

All SW facets:

@ndushay ndushay self-assigned this Sep 14, 2023
@ndushay ndushay changed the title Spike: use stanford_mods for indexing argo facets that are supposed to be done like SW Index argo facets starting "SW" with the same code used by SearchWorks for those facets Sep 17, 2023
@ndushay ndushay removed their assignment Sep 17, 2023
@aaron-collier aaron-collier self-assigned this Sep 20, 2023
@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndushay commented Oct 3, 2023

ACTION ITEM per discussion with @andrewjbtw @ndushay and @aaron-collier on 10/3/23: Aaron will write "report" tickets for sussing out the differences between stanford mods indexing and dor-indexing-app for this part of descriptive metadata.

@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndushay commented Oct 9, 2023

closing this ticket; there are some tendrils in PRs #1005 and #1010 and we will follow through for those tickets.

@ndushay ndushay closed this as completed Oct 9, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants