Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Board Restructure #54

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2022
Merged

Board Restructure #54

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2022

Conversation

ehsteve
Copy link
Member

@ehsteve ehsteve commented Jan 26, 2021

Description

The purpose of this SEP is to restructure the board. Now that the community has grown significantly as well as matured, they're is a need for a more equitable sharing of responsibilities. The board also recognizes that its structure is not conducive for making financial decisions in a timely manner. The primary purpose of this SEP is to recognize the existence and need for an executive that goes beyond the the executive director (ED). This SEP gives the executive the responsibility to manage the financials aspects of the Project. The structure of the executive shall be defined in another SEP. The board will oversee the executive by providing advise as well as consent. What consent means is not explicitly defined on purpose to allow for that process to be flexibly defined by the current ED and board.

@ehsteve ehsteve requested review from a team and Cadair January 26, 2021 19:19
Copy link
Member

@rhewett rhewett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm generally OK with this as is, as long as it is a step toward shrinking and refocusing the board.

Copy link
Member

@dpshelio dpshelio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, the executive will be the first point of contact with NumFOCUS? I think that should be added to the list of points of responsabilities (unless manage finances have that implicitly).

@Cadair
Copy link
Member

Cadair commented Mar 29, 2021

unless manage finances have that implicitly

It does, as (currently) our finances are NumFOCUS. It is of course possible we part ways with NF at some point so this wording is more generic. I wouldn't be adverse to adding it explicitly though.

@tiagopereira
Copy link
Member

Should we remove the section "Board members" with the initial board members? Seems a bit dated now. Or was it meant to be there forever?

SEP-0002.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@Cadair
Copy link
Member

Cadair commented May 11, 2022

Are we in a position where we can merge this?

@Cadair
Copy link
Member

Cadair commented Jun 24, 2022

Should we remove the section "Board members" with the initial board members? Seems a bit dated now. Or was it meant to be there forever?

I think the idea was to leave it there forever. As the board is self-electing, I think it's kind of important to define the starting point of that chain.

@Cadair Cadair requested a review from tiagopereira June 24, 2022 15:40
@Cadair Cadair merged commit 69580ef into sunpy:master Jun 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants