WIP JSON serialization #101
Conversation
|
Test PASSed. |
|
Another idea here would be to jettison the parent fields (filter them all out on the way out) and just compose the object from its own relevant fields. Still would have the issue with building containers for nested structures. |
|
Just checked that this serializes ok - downside is that it won't serialize any of the parents stuff, or deserialize it back. Plus, the issue with the containers for nested objects is still there. |
| @@ -144,6 +145,19 @@ class ((( m.identifier | classnameify )))(SBP): | |||
| c = Container(**exclude_fields(self)) | |||
| self.payload = ((( m.identifier | classnameify )))._parser.build(c) | |||
| return self.pack() | |||
|
|
|||
| def to_json(self): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With the __dict__, this doesn't get the parent objects?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It does (I had filtered them originally with exclude_fields).
|
Replaced by #103. |
Playing around with JSON serialization. This is pretty broken and not working:
payload); what really needs to happen is that the json dict from the parent needs to be merged in with the child's json dict. Or some such.from_jsonapproach here is no bueno with nested structures -json.loadsreturns dicts and lists, while the existing objects are built up from construct into containers. Need some kind of json-to-construct mapping function.Thoughts and ideas on how to do a better job here very welcome!
DO NOT MERGE
/cc @mookerji