Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Magit Feature Request magit-list-repositories #7083

Closed
rphillips opened this issue Sep 11, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Magit Feature Request magit-list-repositories #7083

rphillips opened this issue Sep 11, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@rphillips
Copy link

I think it would be nice to have <space>gL binding for magit-list-repositories. It's trivial to add the binding, but where I got hung up is the buffer only responds to emacs mode bindings (ctrl-z then a return will open the status buffer). I'm not sure how to fix it.

In my dotspacemacs/user-config() I configured the feature with:

  (setq magit-repository-directories 
      '( "~/Development" ))
@TheBB
Copy link
Collaborator

TheBB commented Sep 12, 2016

Please look up evilification to fix the bindings issue.

rphillips pushed a commit to rphillips/spacemacs that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2016
@rphillips
Copy link
Author

Thanks. I added a PR

@arronmabrey
Copy link
Contributor

@rphillips do you have a link to the PR?

TheBB pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2016
@d12frosted
Copy link
Collaborator

@arronmabrey GitHub automatically adds references. But here is PR: #7096 .

jonaustin pushed a commit to jonaustin/spacemacs that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2016
george-miller pushed a commit to george-miller/spacemacs that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2016
@syl20bnr syl20bnr closed this as completed Apr 2, 2017
CodingSolo pushed a commit to CodingSolo/spacemacs that referenced this issue Oct 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Mailing list
  
Pending merge
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants