-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated the demo application to Symfony 2.7 #72
Conversation
You should also commit the changes to the |
@xabbuh I did ... there is none :) |
But there should be a difference if you bump the requirement to Symfony 2.7. |
@xabbuh in the |
By the way, I updated Symfony following the recommendation of @weaverryan: $ composer update symfony/symfony sensio/distribution-bundle --with-dependencies |
To be more clear: You now make use of the |
OK. I understand you now :) Should I use |
Not sure if that really matters. What was the reasoning for the old constraint? |
There was no particular reasoning. I always use the |
@javiereguiluz what about updating other deps too (DoctrineBundle got a new release for instance) |
@stof I fully agree! The constraint is now The current constraints are as follows. Should we update any other dependency? "require": {
"php" : ">=5.3.3",
"ext-pdo_sqlite" : "*",
"doctrine/doctrine-bundle" : "~1.5",
"doctrine/doctrine-fixtures-bundle" : "~2.2",
"doctrine/orm" : "~2.2,>=2.2.3",
"erusev/parsedown" : "~1.5",
"incenteev/composer-parameter-handler" : "~2.0",
"ircmaxell/password-compat" : "~1.0",
"leafo/scssphp" : "~0.1.",
"patchwork/jsqueeze" : "~1.0",
"sensio/distribution-bundle" : "~3.0.12",
"sensio/framework-extra-bundle" : "~3.0",
"symfony/assetic-bundle" : "~2.3",
"symfony/monolog-bundle" : "~2.4",
"symfony/swiftmailer-bundle" : "~2.3",
"symfony/symfony" : "~2.7",
"twig/extensions" : "~1.0"
}, |
Well, you should probably update all deps to their latest stable versions ( |
OK then. I've updated everything to their latest versions. |
btw, we used the |
👍 |
@javiereguiluz for the future - I had an idea. We could upgrade a branch of the |
@weaverryan I like the idea and I'm going to implement it for 2.8. Thanks! |
This fixes #71