Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FrameworkBundle] Fix a typo and add a test to prevent new regressions #18657

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 28, 2016

Conversation

GuilhemN
Copy link
Contributor

@GuilhemN GuilhemN commented Apr 27, 2016

Q A
Branch? master
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets
License MIT
Doc PR

This fixes a typo introduced in #18630 and adds a new functional test to avoid most regressions in service definitions in the future when features are only available in non-debug mode.

cc @nicolas-grekas

@GuilhemN GuilhemN changed the title Fix a typo and add a check to prevent regressions [FrameworkBundle] Fix a typo and add a test to prevent new regressions Apr 27, 2016
@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Apr 28, 2016

Thank you @Ener-Getick.

@fabpot fabpot merged commit 61872ce into symfony:master Apr 28, 2016
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2016
… regressions (Ener-Getick)

This PR was merged into the 3.1-dev branch.

Discussion
----------

[FrameworkBundle] Fix a typo and add a test to prevent new regressions

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | master
| Bug fix?      | yes
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        |

This fixes a typo introduced in #18630 and adds a new functional test to avoid most regressions in service definitions in the future when features are only available in non-debug mode.

cc @nicolas-grekas

Commits
-------

61872ce Fix a typo and add a check to prevent regressions
@GuilhemN GuilhemN deleted the FIX branch April 28, 2016 14:04
@fabpot fabpot mentioned this pull request May 13, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants