[String] Fix Inflector for 'status' #50810
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Google Ngram Viewer also shows that the usage of |
javiereguiluz
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2023
derrabus
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2023
|
Thank you @evertharmeling. |
This was referenced Jul 29, 2023
Merged
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Although different sources prefer
statusoverstatusesas the plural (or the other way around), not sure if it matters much in preference for the codebase.It’s more common to use “status” as the plural, though either way is fine.So status and statuses can both be used as the plural, depending on the context, but status is more common."Statuses" is marginally more popular than "status." ("Status" has been losing ground against "statuses" since the 1960s.)