Reversing for cardinal directions in relation member roles #2004
Conversation
|
Thanks, committed as c43d915. |
|
Long done deed I know. But I fail to see why this would make sense, why would the cardinal direction role of a member of a relation change when the (OSM) way direction changes? Contrary to forward/backward the use as a member of route with the role north, south, etc is not relative to the ways drawing direction. |
|
@simonpoole This is probably a case where iD does a thing because JOSM also does it. We link to the JOSM code in a comment, and my reading of it is that it reversed the "Combined switchers" when reversing relation roles. |
|
Even JOSM devs are known to be wrong now and then :-) |
re: #2004 (comment) Per thread https://twitter.com/bhousel/status/1025805098063208448 JOSM has stopped doing this too
|
I've removed the cardinal direction reversals in 2e6799a |
This adds smart reversing for north<->south and east<->west in relation member roles when reversing a way.