-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add logtail tests #1114
Merged
Merged
Add logtail tests #1114
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
DentonGentry
force-pushed
the
dgentry-coverage
branch
from
January 12, 2021 19:35
bb7849f
to
fb06302
Compare
bradfitz
reviewed
Jan 12, 2021
bradfitz
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2021
Expand TestUploadMessages to also exercise the encoding functions in logtail, like JSON logging and timestamps. Other tests frequently send logs but a) don't check the result and b) do so by happenstance, such that the lines in encode() were not consistently being exercised and leading to spurious changes in code coverage. Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
Make the client buffer some messages before the upload server becomes available. Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
%q escapes binary characters for us. raw strings avoid so much backslash escaping Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
DentonGentry
force-pushed
the
dgentry-coverage
branch
from
January 12, 2021 20:24
fb06302
to
cd41da2
Compare
DentonGentry
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2021
This reverts commit e4f53e9. At least two of these tests are flakey, reverting until they can be made more robust. Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
DentonGentry
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2021
DentonGentry
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2021
+ add a test for parseAndRemoveLogLevel() + add a test for drainPendingMessages() + test JSON log encoding including several special cases Other tests frequently send logs but a) don't check the result and b) do so by happenstance, such that the code in encode() was not consistently being exercised and leading to spurious changes in code coverage. These tests attempt to more systematically test the logging function. This is the second attempt to add these tests, the first attempt (in #1114) had two issues: 1. httptest.NewServer creates multiple goroutine handlers, and logtail uses goroutines to upload, but the first version had no locking in the server to guard this. 2. The channel to notify the test of the arrival of data had a depth of 1, in cases where the Logger sent multiple uploads it would block the server. This resulted in the first iteration of these tests being flaky, and we reverted it. This new version of the tests has passed with go test -race -count=10000 and seems solid. Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
DentonGentry
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2021
+ add a test for parseAndRemoveLogLevel() + add a test for drainPendingMessages() + test JSON log encoding including several special cases Other tests frequently send logs but a) don't check the result and b) do so by happenstance, such that the code in encode() was not consistently being exercised and leading to spurious changes in code coverage. These tests attempt to more systematically test the logging function. This is the second attempt to add these tests, the first attempt (in #1114) had two issues: 1. httptest.NewServer creates multiple goroutine handlers, and logtail uses goroutines to upload, but the first version had no locking in the server to guard this. Moved data handling into channels to get synchronization. 2. The channel to notify the test of the arrival of data had a depth of 1, in cases where the Logger sent multiple uploads it would block the server. This resulted in the first iteration of these tests being flaky, and we reverted it. This new version of the tests has passed with go test -race -count=10000 and seems solid. Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
DentonGentry
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2021
+ add a test for parseAndRemoveLogLevel() + add a test for drainPendingMessages() + test JSON log encoding including several special cases Other tests frequently send logs but a) don't check the result and b) do so by happenstance, such that the code in encode() was not consistently being exercised and leading to spurious changes in code coverage. These tests attempt to more systematically test the logging function. This is the second attempt to add these tests, the first attempt (in #1114) had two issues: 1. httptest.NewServer creates multiple goroutine handlers, and logtail uses goroutines to upload, but the first version had no locking in the server to guard this. Moved data handling into channels to get synchronization. 2. The channel to notify the test of the arrival of data had a depth of 1, in cases where the Logger sent multiple uploads it would block the server. This resulted in the first iteration of these tests being flaky, and we reverted it. This new version of the tests has passed with go test -race -count=10000 and seems solid. Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
DentonGentry
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2021
+ add a test for parseAndRemoveLogLevel() + add a test for drainPendingMessages() + test JSON log encoding including several special cases Other tests frequently send logs but a) don't check the result and b) do so by happenstance, such that the code in encode() was not consistently being exercised and leading to spurious changes in code coverage. These tests attempt to more systematically test the logging function. This is the second attempt to add these tests, the first attempt (in #1114) had two issues: 1. httptest.NewServer creates multiple goroutine handlers, and logtail uses goroutines to upload, but the first version had no locking in the server to guard this. Moved data handling into channels to get synchronization. 2. The channel to notify the test of the arrival of data had a depth of 1, in cases where the Logger sent multiple uploads it would block the server. This resulted in the first iteration of these tests being flaky, and we reverted it. This new version of the tests has passed with go test -race -count=10000 and seems solid. Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
DentonGentry
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2021
+ add a test for parseAndRemoveLogLevel() + add a test for drainPendingMessages() + test JSON log encoding including several special cases Other tests frequently send logs but a) don't check the result and b) do so by happenstance, such that the code in encode() was not consistently being exercised and leading to spurious changes in code coverage. These tests attempt to more systematically test the logging function. This is the second attempt to add these tests, the first attempt (in #1114) had two issues: 1. httptest.NewServer creates multiple goroutine handlers, and logtail uses goroutines to upload, but the first version had no locking in the server to guard this. Moved data handling into channels to get synchronization. 2. The channel to notify the test of the arrival of data had a depth of 1, in cases where the Logger sent multiple uploads it would block the server. This resulted in the first iteration of these tests being flaky, and we reverted it. This new version of the tests has passed with go test -race -count=10000 and seems solid. Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
DentonGentry
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2021
+ add a test for parseAndRemoveLogLevel() + add a test for drainPendingMessages() + test JSON log encoding including several special cases Other tests frequently send logs but a) don't check the result and b) do so by happenstance, such that the code in encode() was not consistently being exercised and leading to spurious changes in code coverage. These tests attempt to more systematically test the logging function. This is the second attempt to add these tests, the first attempt (in #1114) had two issues: 1. httptest.NewServer creates multiple goroutine handlers, and logtail uses goroutines to upload, but the first version had no locking in the server to guard this. Moved data handling into channels to get synchronization. 2. The channel to notify the test of the arrival of data had a depth of 1, in cases where the Logger sent multiple uploads it would block the server. This resulted in the first iteration of these tests being flaky, and we reverted it. This new version of the tests has passed with go test -race -count=10000 and seems solid. Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.