Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v2.12.0 #130

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2019

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 18, 2019

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin devDependencies minor 2.11.0 -> 2.12.0
@typescript-eslint/parser devDependencies minor 2.11.0 -> 2.12.0

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint

v2.12.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-null-coal] fixer w/ mixed logicals (#​1326) (f9a9fbf)
  • eslint-plugin: [quotes] ignore backticks for interface properties (#​1311) (3923a09)
Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnec-cond] check optional chaining (#​1315) (a2a8a0a)

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR is stale, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

Newsflash: Renovate has joined WhiteSource, and is now free for all use. Learn more or view updated terms and privacy policies.

@renovate renovate bot added the internal label Dec 18, 2019
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 77026c7 to 7c8f6b1 Compare December 18, 2019 03:42
@renovate renovate bot merged commit bdf9757 into master Dec 19, 2019
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch December 19, 2019 19:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant