You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
All existing tests in LuaJIT suite seem to be written according to the current Lua style guide and violate several practices mentioned by @Totktonada in the review:
Use local for variables (tap, test).
Use os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1) at the end.
Furthermore, the naming of all files doesn't respect to the one we agreed some time ago and dumped in tarantool/doc#1004.
Consider adjusting the chunks within this suite regarding remarks above.
I see this as a good issue to dive into our LuaJIT suite prior to #4064 and #4473.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixed in tarantool/luajit in tarantool/luajit@cf84758. The submodule was updated in tarantool in 2.4.0-121-g3c6416291 (3c64162), 2.3.1-74-g637db97b2 (637db97), 2.2.2-67-gddd3ce096 (ddd3ce0), 1.10.5-32-gd57146a21 (d57146a).
All existing tests in LuaJIT suite seem to be written according to the current Lua style guide and violate several practices mentioned by @Totktonada in the review:
Furthermore, the naming of all files doesn't respect to the one we agreed some time ago and dumped in tarantool/doc#1004.
Consider adjusting the chunks within this suite regarding remarks above.
I see this as a good issue to dive into our LuaJIT suite prior to #4064 and #4473.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: