New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked #9235
Labels
2.10
Target is 2.10 and all newer release/master branches
bug
Something isn't working
crash
replication
Comments
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
Astronomax
added a commit
to Astronomax/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
sergepetrenko
added
the
2.10
Target is 2.10 and all newer release/master branches
label
Dec 11, 2023
sergepetrenko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes #9235 NO_DOC=bugfix
sergepetrenko
pushed a commit
to sergepetrenko/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix (cherry picked from commit 59b817e)
sergepetrenko
pushed a commit
to sergepetrenko/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2023
Before this patch there was an execution sequence in which the assertion in box_wait_limbo_acked would fail. The assertion is that the lsn of the last entry in limbo is always positive after wal_sync. Fix it. Closes tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=bugfix (cherry picked from commit 59b817e)
sergepetrenko
added a commit
to sergepetrenko/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2023
Follow-up tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=changelog NO_TEST=changelog Co-authored-by: Kseniia Antonova <73473519+xuniq@users.noreply.github.com>
sergepetrenko
added a commit
to sergepetrenko/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2023
Follow-up tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=changelog NO_TEST=changelog Co-authored-by: Kseniia Antonova <73473519+xuniq@users.noreply.github.com>
sergepetrenko
added a commit
to sergepetrenko/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2023
Follow-up tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=changelog NO_TEST=changelog Co-authored-by: Kseniia Antonova <73473519+xuniq@users.noreply.github.com>
sergepetrenko
added a commit
to sergepetrenko/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2023
Follow-up tarantool#9235 NO_DOC=changelog NO_TEST=changelog Co-authored-by: Kseniia Antonova <73473519+xuniq@users.noreply.github.com>
sergepetrenko
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2023
Follow-up #9235 NO_DOC=changelog NO_TEST=changelog Co-authored-by: Kseniia Antonova <73473519+xuniq@users.noreply.github.com>
sergepetrenko
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2023
Follow-up #9235 NO_DOC=changelog NO_TEST=changelog Co-authored-by: Kseniia Antonova <73473519+xuniq@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
2.10
Target is 2.10 and all newer release/master branches
bug
Something isn't working
crash
replication
Bug description
Now it is possible for the following assertion in
box_wait_limbo_acked
function to fail:tarantool/src/box/box.cc
Line 2778 in 2d5e987
Steps to reproduce
Run the following lua test:
Actual behavior
Assert fails.
Expected behavior
Assert doesn't fails.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: