You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's possible to cause the prover to panic by using a statement whose aggregation factor is inconsistent with its generators. This can be fixed by adding an additional prover consistency check. Another option is to make the prover more flexible in its handling of generators, to allow for the use of a larger generator set than is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the prover will panic if the statement aggregation factor
does not precisely correspond to that of the inner-product generators.
It would be best to allow the prover to use a larger generator set,
similarly to how the verifier operates, in order to be more flexible.
This PR adds such a fix, and includes a regression test.
Review of this PR should include asserting that removing the fix code
will fail the regression test.
Closes#99.
It's possible to cause the prover to panic by using a statement whose aggregation factor is inconsistent with its generators. This can be fixed by adding an additional prover consistency check. Another option is to make the prover more flexible in its handling of generators, to allow for the use of a larger generator set than is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: