Skip to content

ci(fix): macOS add workflow to assemble macOS universal binaries (#6326)

Sign in for the full log view
GitHub Actions / JUnit Test Report failed May 8, 2024 in 0s

36 tests run, 33 passed, 0 skipped, 3 failed.

Annotations

Check failure on line 1 in feature:142:5

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / JUnit Test Report

feature:142:5.Scenario: Syncing node while also mining before tip sync: tests/features/Sync.feature:142:5

Step panicked. Captured output: Service on port 18437 never started
Raw output
Scenario Outline: Syncing node while also mining before tip sync
     Given I have a seed node SEED
     When I have wallet WALLET1 connected to seed node SEED
     When I have wallet WALLET2 connected to seed node SEED
     When I have mining node MINER connected to base node SEED and wallet WALLET1
     When I have a base node SYNCER connected to all seed nodes
     When I have mine-before-tip mining node MINER2 connected to base node SYNCER and wallet WALLET2
     When I stop node SYNCER
     When mining node MINER mines 101 blocks with min difficulty 1 and max difficulty 9999999999
     Then node SEED is at height 101
     When I start base node SYNCER
      Step failed:
      Defined: tests/features/Sync.feature:134:5
      Matched: integration_tests/tests/steps/node_steps.rs:68:1
      Step panicked. Captured output: Service on port 18437 never started
      Client {
          base_nodes: {},
          blocks: {},
          miners: {
              "MINER": MinerProcess {
                  name: "MINER",
                  base_node_name: "SEED",
                  wallet_name: "WALLET1",
                  mine_until_height: 100000,
                  stealth: false,
              },
              "MINER2": MinerProcess {
                  name: "MINER2",
                  base_node_name: "SYNCER",
                  wallet_name: "WALLET2",
                  mine_until_height: 100000,
                  stealth: false,
              },
          },
          ffi_wallets: {},
          wallets: {},
          merge_mining_proxies: {},
          chat_clients: [],
          transactions: {},
          wallet_addresses: {},
          utxos: {},
          output_hash: None,
          pre_image: None,
          wallet_connected_to_base_node: {
              "WALLET1": "SEED",
              "WALLET2": "SEED",
          },
          seed_nodes: [
              "SEED",
          ],
          wallet_tx_ids: {},
          errors: [],
          last_imported_tx_ids: [],
          last_merge_miner_response: Null,
      }

Check failure on line 1 in feature:8:3

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / JUnit Test Report

feature:8:3.Scenario: Wallet sending and receiving one-sided transactions: tests/features/WalletTransactions.feature:8:3

Step panicked. Captured output: One sided transaction from WALLET_A to WALLET_B with amount 1000000 at fee 100 failed to be broadcasted
Raw output
Scenario: Wallet sending and receiving one-sided transactions
     Given I have a seed node NODE
     When I have 1 base nodes connected to all seed nodes
     When I have wallet WALLET_A connected to all seed nodes
     When I have wallet WALLET_B connected to all seed nodes
     When I have wallet WALLET_C connected to all seed nodes
     When I have mining node MINER connected to base node NODE and wallet WALLET_A
     When mining node MINER mines 15 blocks
     Then all nodes are at height 15
     When I wait 5 seconds
     When I wait for wallet WALLET_A to have at least 55000000000 uT
     Then I send a one-sided transaction of 1000000 uT from WALLET_A to WALLET_B at fee 100
      Step failed:
      Defined: tests/features/WalletTransactions.feature:19:5
      Matched: integration_tests/tests/steps/wallet_steps.rs:745:1
      Step panicked. Captured output: One sided transaction from WALLET_A to WALLET_B with amount 1000000 at fee 100 failed to be broadcasted
      Client {
          base_nodes: {},
          blocks: {},
          miners: {
              "MINER": MinerProcess {
                  name: "MINER",
                  base_node_name: "NODE",
                  wallet_name: "WALLET_A",
                  mine_until_height: 100000,
                  stealth: false,
              },
          },
          ffi_wallets: {},
          wallets: {},
          merge_mining_proxies: {},
          chat_clients: [],
          transactions: {},
          wallet_addresses: {},
          utxos: {},
          output_hash: None,
          pre_image: None,
          wallet_connected_to_base_node: {
              "WALLET_A": "NODE",
              "WALLET_B": "NODE",
              "WALLET_C": "NODE",
          },
          seed_nodes: [
              "NODE",
          ],
          wallet_tx_ids: {},
          errors: [],
          last_imported_tx_ids: [],
          last_merge_miner_response: Null,
      }

Check failure on line 1 in feature:212:5

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / JUnit Test Report

feature:212:5.Scenario: As a client I want to receive a one-sided transaction: tests/features/WalletFFI.feature:212:5

Step panicked. Captured output: One sided transaction from SENDER to FFI_RECEIVER with amount 1000000 at fee 20 failed to be broadcasted
Raw output
Scenario: As a client I want to receive a one-sided transaction
     Given I have a seed node SEED
     When I have a base node BASE1 connected to all seed nodes
     When I have a base node BASE2 connected to all seed nodes
     When I have wallet SENDER connected to base node BASE1
     And I have a ffi wallet FFI_RECEIVER connected to base node BASE2
     When I have mining node MINER connected to base node BASE1 and wallet SENDER
     When mining node MINER mines 10 blocks
     Then I wait for wallet SENDER to have at least 5000000 uT
     Then I send a one-sided transaction of 1000000 uT from SENDER to FFI_RECEIVER at fee 20
      Step failed:
      Defined: tests/features/WalletFFI.feature:221:9
      Matched: integration_tests/tests/steps/wallet_steps.rs:745:1
      Step panicked. Captured output: One sided transaction from SENDER to FFI_RECEIVER with amount 1000000 at fee 20 failed to be broadcasted
      Client {
          base_nodes: {},
          blocks: {},
          miners: {
              "MINER": MinerProcess {
                  name: "MINER",
                  base_node_name: "BASE1",
                  wallet_name: "SENDER",
                  mine_until_height: 100000,
                  stealth: false,
              },
          },
          ffi_wallets: {
              "FFI_RECEIVER": WalletFFI {
                  name: "FFI_RECEIVER",
                  port: 18006,
                  base_dir: "/runner/_work/tari/tari/integration_tests/tests/temp/cucumber_6367/Wallet FFI/As a client I want to receive a one-sided transaction/ffi_wallets/FFI_RECEIVER_port_18006",
                  wallet: Mutex {
                      data: Wallet {
                          ptr: 0x000055c4d1d20880,
                          liveness_data: Mutex {
                              data: {},
                              poisoned: false,
                              ..
                          },
                          balance: CachedBalance {
                              available: 0,
                              time_locked: 0,
                              pending_incoming: 0,
                              pending_outgoing: 0,
                          },
                      },
                      poisoned: false,
                      ..
                  },
              },
          },
          wallets: {},
          merge_mining_proxies: {},
          chat_clients: [],
          transactions: {},
          wallet_addresses: {},
          utxos: {},
          output_hash: None,
          pre_image: None,
          wallet_connected_to_base_node: {
              "SENDER": "BASE1",
          },
          seed_nodes: [
              "SEED",
          ],
          wallet_tx_ids: {},
          errors: [],
          last_imported_tx_ids: [],
          last_merge_miner_response: Null,
      }