You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For some applications it would be useful to have a consistent enumeration of boundaries. The numbering system is somehow arbitrary and changes depending on the FE-System in use. As we are theoretically independent of the dimension, I would suggest the following numbering system
$$i_{face} = \left\{\begin{array}
2*j \quad\text{if face is at $\xi_j=0$}\\\
2*j + 1 \quad\text{if face is at $\xi_j=1$}
\end{array}\right.$$
for $j\in{0,\dots, n_{dim}-1}$ axis dimensions. This is applicable to higher dimensions as well
This would require to change the layout of the extract_boundary routine
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For some applications it would be useful to have a consistent enumeration of boundaries. The numbering system is somehow arbitrary and changes depending on the FE-System in use. As we are theoretically independent of the dimension, I would suggest the following numbering system
for$j\in{0,\dots, n_{dim}-1}$ axis dimensions. This is applicable to higher dimensions as well
This would require to change the layout of the
extract_boundary
routineThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: