Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add is_visible getter to Window #61

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 27, 2021
Merged

feat: Add is_visible getter to Window #61

merged 6 commits into from
May 27, 2021

Conversation

lemarier
Copy link
Member

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Documentation
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes. Issue #___
  • No

The PR fulfills these requirements:

  • When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. fix: #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)
  • A change file is added if any packages will require a version bump due to this PR per the instructions in the readme.

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:
Related to #43

@amrbashir amrbashir marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2021 09:44
@amrbashir amrbashir requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2021 09:44
@amrbashir amrbashir requested a review from a team May 27, 2021 09:44
@lemarier lemarier merged commit c402a38 into dev May 27, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request May 27, 2021
@lemarier lemarier deleted the feat/is-visible branch May 27, 2021 12:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants