Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reporting integration and xunit? #573

Closed
minoseah629 opened this issue Mar 28, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

Reporting integration and xunit? #573

minoseah629 opened this issue Mar 28, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@minoseah629
Copy link

Hello,
I see that provided in the below link, there are specific sections for MSTest and NUnit integration.
https://github.com/techtalk/SpecFlow/wiki/Reporting

My question is there any plans to extend this section to include xunit?

@SubjectiveReality
Copy link

+1 -- am currently researching tools and the team uses xunit for unit tests so it would be nice to have consistency across Asserts.

@darrencauthon
Copy link
Contributor

darrencauthon commented Jun 21, 2016

@darrencauthon Note for later:

  • Drop the Tom Cruise Pull Request meme

@jjwilliams42
Copy link

jjwilliams42 commented Nov 2, 2016

Any progress on this? Or can anyone point me in the right direction so I can contribute? This almost works, because luckily, xunit has an -nunit switch to generate an nunit formatted report (Yayyy! But it doesn't output TestResults.txt like nunit ... boooo). And the HTML that gets output from specflow.exe is wonky. See attached image. It says 0 features passed 100% (The feature is actually AuthenticationFeature, with one scenario - Login).

2016-11-01 5

@lvermeulen
Copy link

This seems to be an XSLT issue. I faced the same problem and simply edited the (NUnit) XSLT until I got what I wanted.

@JnManso
Copy link

JnManso commented Nov 13, 2017

@lvermeulen is possible to share the xslt that you created? Thanks!

@SabotageAndi
Copy link
Contributor

Closed because of irrelevance for SpecFlow 3, since reports have been removed for now and will probably re-implemented differently.

For more details see #1036

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jul 8, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants