in-toto attestations (ITE-6) as a formatter. #88
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* added some skeleton code more or less copied from PR #13 by dlorenc * Added a dummy implementation that just prints the input/output resources. * Test to bump to #minor * Use correct branch for "master" * Fixes release branch name too. * added deployment file for eks
…… (#3) * temp commit with more logging to get understanding of the resource structure * fixed unit tests * fixing unit tests
* temp commit with more logging to get understanding of the resource structure * fixed unit tests * fixing unit tests * Store entire taskrun as recipe.arguments. * Store spec as well, not just status
* temp commit with more logging to get understanding of the resource structure * fixed unit tests * fixing unit tests * Store entire taskrun as recipe.arguments. * Store spec as well, not just status * removed temp logger * capture subjects if result name is *-DIGEST and materials * Resolve automerge conflict. * Added script to pull an attestation
* temp commit with more logging to get understanding of the resource structure * fixed unit tests * fixing unit tests * Store entire taskrun as recipe.arguments. * Store spec as well, not just status * removed temp logger * capture subjects if result name is *-DIGEST and materials * Resolve automerge conflict. * Added script to pull an attestation * capture builder and git materials
* added more fields and capture shasum output * ignore newlines * cleaned up the code a little * use sub from result too
* added some skeleton code more or less copied from PR #13 by dlorenc * Added a dummy implementation that just prints the input/output resources. * Test to bump to #minor * Use correct branch for "master" * Fixes release branch name too. * added deployment file for eks
…… (#3) * temp commit with more logging to get understanding of the resource structure * fixed unit tests * fixing unit tests
* temp commit with more logging to get understanding of the resource structure * fixed unit tests * fixing unit tests * Store entire taskrun as recipe.arguments. * Store spec as well, not just status
* temp commit with more logging to get understanding of the resource structure * fixed unit tests * fixing unit tests * Store entire taskrun as recipe.arguments. * Store spec as well, not just status * removed temp logger * capture subjects if result name is *-DIGEST and materials * Resolve automerge conflict. * Added script to pull an attestation
* temp commit with more logging to get understanding of the resource structure * fixed unit tests * fixing unit tests * Store entire taskrun as recipe.arguments. * Store spec as well, not just status * removed temp logger * capture subjects if result name is *-DIGEST and materials * Resolve automerge conflict. * Added script to pull an attestation * capture builder and git materials
* added more fields and capture shasum output * ignore newlines * cleaned up the code a little * use sub from result too
Signed-off-by: Dan Lorenc <dlorenc@google.com>
Merge updates from dlorenc's ite-6 branch
Updated intoto formater to latest ite6 spec
Added new config parameter to set the builder id for intoto format.
added 7 commits
May 10, 2021 12:52
…ajority of the container name parsing.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@kommendorkapten: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
tekton-robot
added
needs-rebase
|
Hi @kommendorkapten. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
|
Closing this in favour of #89 which is rebased. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements the basic support for #65.
The formatter uses type hinting to be able to extract information to prepare the in-toto attestation.