-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a table of comparisons from Tekton to other solutions to the README #644
Comments
Hey @RXminuS ! It's a good question :D The main distinction is that Argo itself is more general purpose, and with Tekton Pipelines we are aiming specifically and only for CI/CD use cases. We might have more direct overlap with Argo CI or CD, but we've been in contact with some of the Argo folks, and hopefully in the long run we can collaborate.
If you are interested we created this spreadsheet a while ago which compares some of the Tekton Pipeline goals with existing CI/CD tools (though it compares Argo, not Argo CI or CD). (note this is shared with members of https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/knative-dev - since we used to be part of knative! - you'll have to join the group to see the doc) If this kind of thing is useful, maybe we can port it to markdown in the repo :D |
Thanks for the answer, again it was hard to phrase the question without coming across hostile but your response is super clear and kind :-) I'll have a look at the document. Personally I really like it when projects put similar solutions front and center and highlight the differences as well as similarities. Vue is a classic example and I think that could be useful here too. https://vuejs.org/v2/guide/comparison.html |
Awesome, retitled this issue to make the goal of adding a comparison clear. |
/kind documentation |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. /lifecycle stale Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. /lifecycle rotten Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. /close Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing. |
@tekton-robot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
@vdemeester: Reopened this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. /lifecycle stale Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
I feel like given that we haven't done anything with this at all in so long, maybe it's reasonable to close for now? |
@bobcatfish I still feel like this would be useful, but at a minimum, can you port the spreadsheet that you mentioned in #644 (comment) to markdown before closing? Don't know about others, but I requested access to that Google Group like a year ago and never got it, so was never able to read it. |
Sounds good @dcherman , we can do that! btw you should be able to join the google group at https://github.com/tektoncd/community/blob/master/contact.md#mailing-list (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/tekton-dev) without anyone needing to approve your membership 🤔 |
@bobcatfish Ya, was able to join the Tekton mailing list without approval, but I think that spreadsheet is owned by knative-dev which seems to require approval to join (https://groups.google.com/g/knative-dev). That said, I might've asked for access to the spreadsheet directly versus joining the Google group. It's been quite a while since I did that, so I can't remember :) |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. /lifecycle rotten Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. /close Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing. |
@tekton-robot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Maybe an obnoxious question, but I just can't see a lot of differentiation with Argo CI/CD...a project that is already adopted for things like Kubeflow. I'm all for different projects to attack the same problem with different priorities, but in this case it seems like creating yarn after npm had already adopted all of its features.
Maybe good to outline a clear focus and how that differs from existing tools?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: