Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

divide ApplyTaskResultsToPipelineResults tests into success and error #6388

Merged

Conversation

Yongxuanzhang
Copy link
Member

@Yongxuanzhang Yongxuanzhang commented Mar 17, 2023

Changes

This commit divides ApplyTaskResultsToPipelineResults unit tests into success and error, two separate tests to improve the readability and easier to find bugs. Before this commit, the unit test doesn't check the case when the return error is not nil but expect nil, and some errors are not checked.

No functional changes, but fix some tests bugs.

/kind misc

Signed-off-by: Yongxuan Zhang yongxuanzhang@google.com

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Has Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings)
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

NONE

This commit divides ApplyTaskResultsToPipelineResults unit tests into
success and error, two separate tests to improve the readibility and
easier to find bugs. Before this commit, the unit test doesn't check the
case when the return error is not nil but expect nil, and some errors
are not checked.

Signed-off-by: Yongxuan Zhang yongxuanzhang@google.com
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 17, 2023
Copy link
Member

@dibyom dibyom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with one minor comment

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dibyom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 17, 2023
@@ -3764,6 +3709,164 @@ func TestApplyTaskResultsToPipelineResults(t *testing.T) {
}},
},
expectedResults: nil,
}, {
description: "multiple-results-multiple-successful-tasks ",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT: extra space after tasks "

skippedTasks: []v1beta1.SkippedTask{{
Name: "skippedTask",
}},
expectedResults: nil,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same as @dibyom's comment ⬇️ expectedResults is nil by default

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we keep the definition but no need to initialize to nil here

@pritidesai
Copy link
Member

thanks a bunch @Yongxuanzhang for organizing these tests, I left some NITs, please feel free to address them in a separate PR.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 18, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 3c3de5b into tektoncd:main Mar 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants