Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Migrate Propagated Workspaces to Stable #6432

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Migrate Propagated Workspaces to Stable #6432

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2023

Conversation

chitrangpatel
Copy link
Member

@chitrangpatel chitrangpatel commented Mar 25, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Issue 6107 Migrate Propagated Workspaces to Stable

Prior to this, propagated workspaces was hidden behind the beta feature gate. This feature is now a stable feature.

Changes

  • Removed alpha/beta API fields

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Has Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings)
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

Propagated workspaces is now a stable feature.

@chitrangpatel
Migrate Propagated Workspaces to Stable
9fe9750 
[Issue 6107](tektoncd#6107) Migrate Propagated Workspaces to Stable

Prior to this, propagated workspaces was hidden behind the beta feature gate.
This feature is now a stable feature.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Mar 25, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 25, 2023
@chitrangpatel
Copy link
Member Author

/kind feature

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Mar 25, 2023
@chitrangpatel
Copy link
Member Author

cc @pritidesai @jerop

@chitrangpatel
Copy link
Member Author

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@chitrangpatel: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-alpha-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-beta-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests
  • /test tekton-pipeline-unit-tests

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/pipelinerun.go 88.7% 88.7% -0.0
pkg/reconciler/taskrun/taskrun.go 84.8% 84.8% -0.0
pkg/workspace/apply.go 99.2% 97.4% -1.7

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/pipelinerun.go 88.7% 88.7% -0.0
pkg/reconciler/taskrun/taskrun.go 84.8% 84.8% -0.0
pkg/workspace/apply.go 99.2% 97.4% -1.7

@chitrangpatel
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@chitrangpatel
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests

@chitrangpatel
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@chitrangpatel: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-alpha-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-beta-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests
  • /test tekton-pipeline-unit-tests

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/pipelinerun.go 88.7% 88.7% -0.0
pkg/reconciler/taskrun/taskrun.go 84.8% 84.8% -0.0
pkg/workspace/apply.go 99.2% 97.4% -1.7

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 27, 2023
jerop
jerop approved these changes Mar 28, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jerop jerop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold

@tektoncd/core-maintainers please take a look

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 28, 2023
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dibyom, jerop, vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [dibyom,jerop,vdemeester]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

jerop
jerop reviewed Apr 4, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jerop jerop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the review @vdemeester!

/lgtm
/unhold

@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 4, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 4, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit ecb11fc into tektoncd:main Apr 4, 2023
@jerop jerop mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jerop jerop jerop approved these changes

@vdemeester vdemeester vdemeester approved these changes

@dibyom dibyom dibyom approved these changes

@afrittoli afrittoli Awaiting requested review from afrittoli

@wlynch wlynch Awaiting requested review from wlynch

Assignees

@jerop jerop

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@chitrangpatel @tekton-robot @vdemeester @dibyom @jerop