Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Replace v1beta1.TaskObject with *v1beta1.Task in TaskRun Reconciler #6471

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2023
Merged

Replace v1beta1.TaskObject with *v1beta1.Task in TaskRun Reconciler #6471

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2023

Conversation

JeromeJu
Copy link
Member

@JeromeJu JeromeJu commented Mar 31, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Changes

This commit replaces the v1beta1.TaskObject interface with the *v1beta1.Task by converting ClusterTask to Task for resolving Tasks for TaskRun. The deprecated v1beta1 ClusterTasks are converted to Tasks since the GetTask func and its upstream callers only fetch a task spec and store it in the taskrun status while the kind info is not being used.

/kind misc
part of #5979

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • [n/a] Has Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • [n/a] Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings)
  • [n/a] Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

NONE

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 31, 2023
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/taskrun/resources/taskref.go 89.0% 89.7% 0.7

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/taskrun/resources/taskref.go 89.0% 89.7% 0.7

@JeromeJu JeromeJu mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2023
Closed
4 tasks
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@JeromeJu: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-alpha-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-beta-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests
  • /test tekton-pipeline-unit-tests

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

EmmaMunley
EmmaMunley reviewed Mar 31, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@EmmaMunley EmmaMunley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks good to me. Maybe just add a why? in the commit message/PR for some added context.

pkg/reconciler/taskrun/resources/taskref.go
@@ -217,13 +219,13 @@ type LocalTaskRefResolver struct {
// return an error if it can't find an appropriate Task for any reason.
// TODO: if we want to set source for in-cluster task, set it here.
// https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/5522
func (l *LocalTaskRefResolver) GetTask(ctx context.Context, name string) (v1beta1.TaskObject, *v1beta1.ConfigSource, error) {
func (l *LocalTaskRefResolver) GetTask(ctx context.Context, name string) (*v1beta1.Task, *v1beta1.ConfigSource, error) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we update the doc string here to reflect the conversion of Cluster Task to Task?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Emma, good point! I updated the TaskObject and added the docstring at the helper function.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 31, 2023
@lbernick
Copy link
Member

@JeromeJu could you please add a bit more detail to the commit message/pr description? e.g. explaining that this is for the code that fetches a task spec and stores it in the taskrun status and why we're making these changes

@JeromeJu
Replace v1beta1.TaskObject with *v1beta1.Task in TaskRun Reconciler
c68b7d7 
This commit replaces the v1beta1.TaskObject interface with the *v1beta1.Task by converting ClusterTask to Task for resolving Tasks for TaskRun. The deprecated v1beta1 ClusterTasks are converted to Tasks since the GetTask func and its upstream callers only fetch a task spec and store it in the taskrun status while the kind info is not being used.
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/taskrun/resources/taskref.go 89.0% 89.7% 0.7

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lbernick, vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [lbernick,vdemeester]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/taskrun/resources/taskref.go 89.0% 89.7% 0.7

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/taskrun/resources/taskref.go 89.0% 89.7% 0.7

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/taskrun/resources/taskref.go 89.0% 89.7% 0.7

@lbernick
Copy link
Member

lbernick commented Apr 3, 2023

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 3, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 8cb2529 into tektoncd:main Apr 3, 2023
@lbernick lbernick mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2023
Closed
2 tasks
@l-qing l-qing mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@EmmaMunley EmmaMunley EmmaMunley left review comments

@vdemeester vdemeester vdemeester approved these changes

@lbernick lbernick lbernick approved these changes

@jerop jerop Awaiting requested review from jerop

@pritidesai pritidesai Awaiting requested review from pritidesai

Assignees

@lbernick lbernick

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@JeromeJu @tekton-robot @lbernick @vdemeester @EmmaMunley