Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bridge Assistant Station Trait #80279
Bridge Assistant Station Trait #80279
Changes from 19 commits
e10f0ab
4487bcb
858c569
a3f55d4
d4c35b3
755f685
9ace15d
4c419d1
c3dd4ed
7351da7
ab45e90
63c369c
6cf4600
78e143a
bfb5d82
8f2a2de
21d77a5
59a3246
57f3d99
2732a5b
2a59a04
1aa5068
82fa088
57891da
48b8020
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we're sure this works? i thought
::
was always calculated at compile time. this feels like it's going to give you the initial of/datum/job::title
, not of whatever the job is. Double check this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
its essentially just a wrapper for
initial(job_to_add.title)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need to decide which one of these we want
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still think this is silly, this is what downstreams do because they don't have the luxury of being able to edit maps, we really can just map in coffee machines
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i dont want to add the expectation for mappers to deal with this shit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There doesn't need to be an expectation, a mapper can include a coffee machine if they think one fits the bridge and can not if they do not
If anything, a bridge without a coffee machine is just more job content for the bridge assistant, because now the captain can order them to hunt down a coffee machine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fyi coffee machines require water recyclers which require plastic to be made and also require to be made in an autolathe (no protolathe prints them)
somewhat tangibly related. im just ranting about how annoying it is to make coffee machines- and most maps don't have them? i think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no they dont
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
meta has a coffee machine next to cargo in the cafe, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NOT ON THE BRIDGE
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fwiw i think its fine in principle. let mappers choose a place manually, but automatic otherwise. also makes it easier to migrate existing "unused, but frequently run" maps like kilo/pubby
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer a landmark system.
Is there's a "coffee maker spawn point" use that.
Findt an open table otherwise
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i still disagree with it in practice but since it's a rare station trait it's like... whatever. i wouldn't want to see it expanded