Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct IPAM description #117

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 7, 2020
Merged

Correct IPAM description #117

merged 3 commits into from
May 7, 2020

Conversation

lzap
Copy link
Member

@lzap lzap commented Feb 26, 2020

I have to admit our presentation of "DB" IPAMs is confusing for users. This hopefully clears it out. Also added the two newest additions.

https://community.theforeman.org/t/show-ipam-internal-db-content/17526

@melcorr
Copy link
Member

melcorr commented Feb 26, 2020

Thank you for this. I will get to it soon.

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Mar 20, 2020

Added more info, External IPAM has been merged so maybe we can also document that? Thing is, there is only one EIPAM implementation and that one is in "incubating" stage. We can probably do it but only for upstream now. Here is the procedure how to use EIPAM:

https://community.theforeman.org/t/external-ipam-core-feature-merged/17871

@spetrosi
Copy link
Contributor

I have opened a BZ to implement this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826191

guides/doc-Provisioning_Guide/topics/Networking.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/doc-Provisioning_Guide/topics/Networking.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/doc-Provisioning_Guide/topics/Networking.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/doc-Provisioning_Guide/topics/Networking.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/doc-Provisioning_Guide/topics/Networking.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@spetrosi spetrosi requested a review from tahliar May 6, 2020 14:55
@tahliar tahliar merged commit 040c7da into theforeman:master May 7, 2020
spetrosi added a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2020
* Correct IPAM description

* Correct style

Bug 1826191 - Correct IPAM description

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826191

* Add @tahliar's feedback

Bug 1826191 - Correct IPAM description

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826191

Co-authored-by: Sergei Petrosian <spetrosi@redhat.com>
ianf77 pushed a commit to ianf77/foreman-documentation that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2022
* Correct IPAM description

* Correct style

Bug 1826191 - Correct IPAM description

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826191

* Add @tahliar's feedback

Bug 1826191 - Correct IPAM description

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826191

Co-authored-by: Sergei Petrosian <spetrosi@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants