Build core Ruby packages on EL9 #10144
Conversation
|
| Source1: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/license.txt | ||
| Source1: license.txt |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the remote-URL-but-not-annexed confused the srpmmodule:
TASK [build_package : Build SRPM] *****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
fatal: [rubygem-unicode]: FAILED! => changed=false
command: rpmbuild -bs --define _topdir /tmp/tmpiskuazz5 --define _sourcedir /tmp/tmpiskuazz5/SOURCES --define _builddir /tmp/tmpiskuazz5/BUILD --define _srcrpmdir /tmp/tmpiskuazz5 --define _rpmdir /tmp/tmpiskuazz5 --undefine dist /tmp/tmpiskuazz5/rubygem-unicode.spec
msg: Failed to srpm build
output: |-
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1615420800
error: Bad file: /tmp/tmpiskuazz5/SOURCES/license.txt: No such file or directory
RPM build errors:
Bad file: /tmp/tmpiskuazz5/SOURCES/license.txt: No such file or directory
This was the quickest fix, but we might want to fix the module too. 👀 @ehelms
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this gem isn't even used anymore:
# dnf repoquery --whatrequires rubygem-unicode --quiet
Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8Digging further tells me it was dropped from Hammer: theforeman/hammer-cli#376
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh nice, will drop it then
(the bug in srpm remains ;-) )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think it's a bug: you don't provide the source, or a way to verify the source if it is retrieved. We shouldn't support that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Aye, unicode should be a goner now (theforeman/hammer-cli@327f191)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well, the file is in git, so I do provide the source. Setting the Source0 to an URL just denotes where the file came from.
| @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}ruby(release) | |||
| BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}ruby-devel >= 1.8.7 | |||
| BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}rubygems-devel >= 1.3.5 | |||
| Provides: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(%{gem_name}) = %{version} | |||
| BuildRequires: gcc | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we regenerate the spec I think this should be automatically done. There is an update to 1.6.9 available, so perhaps just do that? Also drops the SCL stuff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sqlite3 1.5.0+ introduces a dep on mini_portile2, which I didn't want to open up as a can-o-worms right now. only updating to 1.4.4 then,
| Source1: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/license.txt | ||
| Source1: license.txt |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this gem isn't even used anymore:
# dnf repoquery --whatrequires rubygem-unicode --quiet
Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8Digging further tells me it was dropped from Hammer: theforeman/hammer-cli#376
evgeni
force-pushed
the
update-eventmachine-spec
branch
from
74d6a36
to
419301e
Compare
evgeni
force-pushed
the
update-eventmachine-spec
branch
from
419301e
to
ad3d3c9
Compare
|
[test rpm-copr] (released rake-compiler) |
|
that's as good as it gets for now. |
It would be nice to capture these in "tiers" of dependencies to make rebuilds easier in the future. Or change Obal to have some number of retries to rebuild in case its a dependency issue. |
I can create a ruby_core_packages_tierX group, and putt rake compiler and websocket extensions in an own. Not sure this should apply to sassc too? |
|
sassc actually also build-requires ffi, so moved it too |
No description provided.