Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update fog to 1.42 #1975

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 5, 2018
Merged

Update fog to 1.42 #1975

merged 1 commit into from Jan 5, 2018

Conversation

xprazak2
Copy link

@xprazak2 xprazak2 commented Dec 8, 2017

For plugin updates, please indicate which repos this should be built into:

  • Nightly
  • 1.16
  • 1.15
  • 1.14

See Foreman's plugin maintainer documentation for more information.


@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Dec 8, 2017

Related rubygem-fog-ovirt PR at #1970

@@ -49,8 +49,7 @@ Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-xml) >= 0.1.1
Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-xml) < 0.2.0
Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(ipaddress) >= 0.5
Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(ipaddress) < 1.0
Requires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}rubygem(json) >= 1.8
Requires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}rubygem(json) < 2.0
Requires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}rubygem(json) >= 2.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This requires us to bump to the newer ruby SCL. Will require some coordination with @ehelms.

Copy link
Member

@dLobatog dLobatog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Waiting on the rubygem-json from the new SCL

Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With #2021 merged this now needs a rebase. I'd expect it to pass then.

@xprazak2
Copy link
Author

xprazak2 commented Jan 4, 2018

Rebased onto latest rpm/develop, lets see if it turns green.

@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Jan 4, 2018

This is pending a mass rebuild of our existing gems in the new SCL.

@ehelms
Copy link
Member

ehelms commented Jan 4, 2018

[test]

@ehelms
Copy link
Member

ehelms commented Jan 4, 2018

Locally, I had to make this additional change:

@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-digitalocean) >= 0.3.0
 Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-google) <= 0.1.0
 Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-json)
 Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-openstack)
+Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-ovirt)
 Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-rackspace)
 Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-vsphere) >= 0.4.0
 Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-xenserver)
@@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-digitalocean) >= 0.3.0
 BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-google) <= 0.1.0
 BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-json)
 BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-openstack)
+BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-ovirt)
 BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-rackspace)
 BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-vsphere) >= 0.4.0
 BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(fog-xenserver)

Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@xprazak2 could you have a look again?

@xprazak2
Copy link
Author

xprazak2 commented Jan 5, 2018

I added fog-ovirt into requirements

@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Jan 5, 2018

Looks like rbovirt needs to be rebuilt into the new SCL first. I'll get on that.

@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Jan 5, 2018

Looks like that's part of #2037

@ehelms
Copy link
Member

ehelms commented Jan 5, 2018

[test]

1 similar comment
@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Jan 5, 2018

[test]

@ekohl ekohl merged commit 735841e into theforeman:rpm/develop Jan 5, 2018
@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Jan 5, 2018

Given @dLobatog wanted to wait for the new SCL (which is here now) I'm merging this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
5 participants