Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #32238 - Bind systemd socket to IPv6 (CP 2.4) #8433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2021

Conversation

ezr-ondrej
Copy link
Member

By default foreman.socket binds to IPv4 only. This was done to make
matching it in Puma easier, but it's not really what should be done in
2021 where everything should be dual stack by default.

In aecc318 the need for this matching
in Puma was removed which makes it much more flexible. The default
should be updated.

Note that the installer currently always overrides it so it's not really
a difference for most, but I want to modify the installer to rely on the
default.

(cherry picked from commit 3347fa4)

By default foreman.socket binds to IPv4 only. This was done to make
matching it in Puma easier, but it's not really what should be done in
2021 where everything should be dual stack by default.

In aecc318 the need for this matching
in Puma was removed which makes it much more flexible. The default
should be updated.

Note that the installer currently always overrides it so it's not really
a difference for most, but I want to modify the installer to rely on the
default.

(cherry picked from commit 3347fa4)
@theforeman-bot
Copy link
Member

Issues: #32238

@ezr-ondrej ezr-ondrej changed the title Fixes #32238 - Bind systemd socket to IPv6 Fixes #32238 - Bind systemd socket to IPv6 (CP 2.4) Apr 7, 2021
@ekohl ekohl merged commit f27eb2b into theforeman:2.4-stable Apr 7, 2021
@ekohl ekohl added the Stable branch PRs that are opened against a stable branch. Usually a cherry pick label Apr 14, 2021
@tbrisker
Copy link
Member

when merging to stable branch please remember to update the "fixed in" field in redmine :)

@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented May 10, 2021

Hmm, I may have to revisit automating that part for merged PRs to stable branches :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs testing Stable branch PRs that are opened against a stable branch. Usually a cherry pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants