Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #33660 - ignore dynflow tables for dump #8822

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2022

Conversation

lzap
Copy link
Member

@lzap lzap commented Oct 7, 2021

Ruby schema dump contains dynflow tables again, which is causing issues with foreign keys with multi-column PKs.

Regression introduced in #8660

@theforeman-bot
Copy link
Member

Issues: #33660

adamruzicka
adamruzicka previously approved these changes Oct 13, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@adamruzicka adamruzicka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works as expected, no mentions of dynflow in db/schema.rb anymore

@adamruzicka
Copy link
Contributor

Even though it seems to work on my machine, test failures seem related

@adamruzicka
Copy link
Contributor

@lzap ping

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Nov 8, 2021

Rebased.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Zapletal <lzap+git@redhat.com>
@lzap lzap force-pushed the dynflow-dump-exclude-33660 branch from 140a224 to 7e588ce Compare March 2, 2022 15:17
@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Mar 2, 2022

Rebased!

@adamruzicka
Copy link
Contributor

Seems to work well, waiting for the tests to pass

Copy link
Contributor

@adamruzicka adamruzicka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The tests were fixed in another pr, let's get this in

@adamruzicka adamruzicka merged commit e7b09b5 into theforeman:develop Mar 3, 2022
@adamruzicka
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @lzap !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants