Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

History reverting to upgrade date - activity data lost or not displayed #873

Closed
spagafus opened this issue Jun 24, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
Labels

Comments

@spagafus
Copy link

Set your log file level to debug, repeat the steps that cause the problem and post the debug infos ZIP which can be retrieved in the System / Bugreport section. If other tools are involved post their logs as well.

Version: 5.1.8
Container version: v5.1.8-ls103
Container release type: Release
Container author: linuxserver.io

Upgraded from image: linuxserver/nzbhydra2:v4.2.1-ls46 on 15/06/23 and now the history reverts to that date. I haven't been able to determine if it happens after a cleanup job runs or some other event trigger.

This is an example of the result from the Search History page which shows a gap as if there's been no activity between 06-15 and 06-24 though there has been activity.

2023-06-24 06:19 | Update query | TV |   | API |  
2023-06-15 08:10 | Update query | TV |   | API

Download History will also remove items downloaded since the upgrade date. New items will be shown until the data reverts back to 06-15 and the cycle begins again.

  • What do you expect to happen? What does happen?
    Expect continuity in history data.

  • Can the problem be reproduced? How?
    As far as I can tell it's not user triggered. I has happened multiple times since upgrade.

  • If you use a docker container please tell me which one.
    See above.

@spagafus spagafus added the bug label Jun 24, 2023
@spagafus
Copy link
Author

If this is due to a corrupted db and a one-off problem then I'm willing to remove and let the app recreate it. The history and stats are nice to have but not critical.

@theotherp
Copy link
Owner

theotherp commented Jun 27, 2023 via email

@spagafus
Copy link
Author

Moving forward with a new DB and so far it's working as expected. Unless you're interested in more info we can chalk this up as a one-off corruption and close this issue.

@theotherp
Copy link
Owner

theotherp commented Jun 28, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants