Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ctags configuration dotfile per project basis #595

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gylaz
Copy link
Contributor

@gylaz gylaz commented Aug 1, 2015

Why:

  • Use a config dotfile for ctag options.
  • Can add more options here on per-project basis,
    like excluding directories, and support for language specific DSLs.
  • Start breaking up templates/ directory into smaller subdirectories.

Related to thoughtbot/dotfiles#390

Why:

* Use a config dotfile for ctag options.
* Can add more options here on per-project basis,
  like excluding directories, and support for language specific DSLs.
* Start breaking up `templates/` directory into smaller subdirectories.

Related to thoughtbot/dotfiles#390
@tute
Copy link
Contributor

tute commented Aug 3, 2015

LGTM. You mention "Start breaking up templates/ directory into smaller subdirectories" in your commit message but I don't see related changes.

@gylaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

gylaz commented Aug 3, 2015

... but I don't see related changes.

@tute The new file is in templates/dotfiles/, and that directory gets copied by directory("dotfiles", ".") line. The idea is to follow that direction, and eventually pull out more files into templates/dotfiles/ as well as start new sub-directories. Does that make sense?

@tute
Copy link
Contributor

tute commented Aug 3, 2015

It makes sense, thanks for your clarification.

@gylaz gylaz closed this in 390c0c4 Aug 22, 2015
@tute
Copy link
Contributor

tute commented Aug 22, 2015

Thank you @gylaz! I merged it into master.

@tute tute deleted the gl-add-ctags-config-file branch August 24, 2015 21:02
mike-burns added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2019
Not all of us are blessed with ctags-compatible editors these days, but
that's not the main thing.

Those of us who are using an editor built for programming are [running
ctags automatically], and therefore the configuration in `.ctags` is not
useful.

[running ctags automatically]: https://github.com/ludovicchabant/vim-gutentags/

Of the projects I found on my laptop, none have modified `.ctags` beyond
this default.

This file made more sense [when it was added], but now it's a relic of a
different era.

[when it was added]: #595
Web-Go-To added a commit to Web-Go-To/rails_suspenders that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2023
Not all of us are blessed with ctags-compatible editors these days, but
that's not the main thing.

Those of us who are using an editor built for programming are [running
ctags automatically], and therefore the configuration in `.ctags` is not
useful.

[running ctags automatically]: https://github.com/ludovicchabant/vim-gutentags/

Of the projects I found on my laptop, none have modified `.ctags` beyond
this default.

This file made more sense [when it was added], but now it's a relic of a
different era.

[when it was added]: thoughtbot/suspenders#595
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants