Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃敟 Remove link to Pydantic's benchmark, as it was removed there #5811

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 10, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions docs/en/docs/features.md
Expand Up @@ -189,8 +189,6 @@ With **FastAPI** you get all of **Pydantic**'s features (as FastAPI is based on
* If you know Python types you know how to use Pydantic.
* Plays nicely with your **<abbr title="Integrated Development Environment, similar to a code editor">IDE</abbr>/<abbr title="A program that checks for code errors">linter</abbr>/brain**:
* Because pydantic data structures are just instances of classes you define; auto-completion, linting, mypy and your intuition should all work properly with your validated data.
* **Fast**:
* in <a href="https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/benchmarks/" class="external-link" target="_blank">benchmarks</a> Pydantic is faster than all other tested libraries.
* Validate **complex structures**:
* Use of hierarchical Pydantic models, Python `typing`鈥檚 `List` and `Dict`, etc.
* And validators allow complex data schemas to be clearly and easily defined, checked and documented as JSON Schema.
Expand Down