You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would greatly simplify some things, and make it straightforward to add a run_model_matrix = FALSE arg to the formula method of mold() if we always returned a tibble.
It would also generally clean up the mold() fn call. And things would generally be more type stable for the developer, at the cost of some performance loss if the user passes in a matrix to mold(x = <matrix>) and then the developer wants that back as a matrix. (Then again, they wouldn't have to use mold() if they didn't want to, and we could export the add_intercept_column() fn if we wanted to)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.
It would greatly simplify some things, and make it straightforward to add a
run_model_matrix = FALSE
arg to the formula method ofmold()
if we always returned a tibble.It would also generally clean up the
mold()
fn call. And things would generally be more type stable for the developer, at the cost of some performance loss if the user passes in a matrix tomold(x = <matrix>)
and then the developer wants that back as a matrix. (Then again, they wouldn't have to usemold()
if they didn't want to, and we could export theadd_intercept_column()
fn if we wanted to)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: