New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix formatting of bag imputation on factors #800
Conversation
In workflows, we handle the printing width like this:
I think this is a really good thing to make sure we have so this is more consistent. 👍 I agree that the random IDs are frustrating, but if you look at how this documentation ends up, we don't ever explain about what We could add more explanation, like what we have here, but this page is already getting really long-winded and detailed.
|
I fixed the random step id's here by setting the seed. We shouldn't have to worry about that anymore |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Torsten fixed the |
This pull request has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue. |
There is a bug (reported to maintainer today) in
ipred::predict.classbag()
where the factor levels of the predictions may not be correct. This results in a reverse dependency breakage.This PR
prep(rec, strings_as_factors = FALSE)
)I also made changes to a $%&# Rmd file that is always changing because of
cli::rule()
widths and random step id's.