Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
141 lines (105 loc) · 5.26 KB

service.md

File metadata and controls

141 lines (105 loc) · 5.26 KB
description
Deploying and running Vector as a service

Service Role

When Vector serves as a service, its purpose is to efficiently receive, aggregate, and route data downstream. In this scenario, Vector is the primary service on the host and should take full advantage of all resources.

Vector Configuration

Receiving Data

When Vector is deployed as a service it receives data over the network from upstream clients or services. Relevant sources include the vector, syslog, and tcp sources.

Performance Tuning

Vector is designed, by default, to take full advantage of all system
resources
, which is usually preferred in the service role. As a result, there is nothing special you need to do to improve performance.

On-Disk Buffering

To ensure Vector does not lose data between restarts you'll need to switch the buffer to use the disk for all relevant sinks. This can be accomplished by adding a simple [buffer] table to each of your configured sinks. In addition, we recommend specifying an explicit data_dir for Vector's buffer. For example:

{% code-tabs %} {% code-tabs-item title="vector.toml" %}

data_dir = "/var/lib/vector"

[sinks.backups]
    type = "s3"
    # ...
    
    [sinks.backups.buffer]
        type = "disk"
        max_size = 5000000000 # 5gb

{% endcode-tabs-item %} {% endcode-tabs %}

{% hint style="warning" %} Please make sure that the Vector user has write access to the specified data_dir. {% endhint %}

Please note that there is a performance hit to enabling on-disk buffers of about 3X. We believe this to be a worthwhile tradeoff to ensure data is not lost across restarts.

System Configuration

By default Vector is tuned for performance, there are no extra system level configuration steps necessary to improve performance.

Deployment

Hardware

The hardware needed is highly dependent on your configuration and data volume. Typically, Vector is CPU bound and not memory bound, especially if all buffers are configured to use the disk. Our benchmarks should give you a general idea of resource usage in relation to specific pipelines and data volume.

CPU

Vector benefits greatly from parallel processing, the more cores the better. For example, if you're on AWS, the c5d.* instances will give you the most bang for your buck given their optimization towards CPU and the fact that they include a fast NVME drive for on-disk buffers.

Memory

If you've configured on-disk buffers, then memory should not be your bottleneck. If you opted to keep buffers in-memory, then you'll want to make sure you have at least 2X your cumulative buffer size. For example, if you have an elasticsearch and s3 sink configured to use 100mb and 1gb, then you should ensure you have at least 2.2gb (1.1 * 2) of memory available.

Disk

If you've configured on-disk buffers, then we recommend using local NVMe SSD drives when possible. This will ensure disk IO does not become your bottleneck. For example, if you're on AWS you'll want to choose an instance that includes a local NVME SSD drive, such as the c5d.* instances. The size of the disk should be at least 3 times your cumulative buffer size.

Load balancing

TODO: make this better

If you've configured Vector to receive data over the network then you'll benefit from load balancing. Select sinks offer built-in load balancing, such as the http, tcp, and vector sinks. This is a very rudimentary form of load balancing that requires all clients to know about the available downstream hosts. A more formal load balancing strategy is outside of the scope of this document, but is typically achieved by services such as AWS' ELB, Haproxy, Nginx, and more.

Administration

Configuration Changes

Vector can be reloaded to apply configuration changes. This is the recommended strategy and should be used over restarting when possible.

Updating Vector

To update Vector you'll need to restart the process. Like any service, restarting without disruption is achieved by higher level design decisions, such as load balancing.