New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Flaky test] Lingering job in bgw_db_scheduler_fixed #4859
Comments
https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/actions/runs/3289466699/jobs/5421034736
|
it seems to me that this only fails on 32-bit Linux. I also haven't been able to reproduce it locally so far. |
note, 20cdd9c has a fix for this flaky test? |
Seems like that. Closing. Will reopen if it surfaces again. |
Bah. Still failing: https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/actions/runs/3410736906/jobs/5674063710 |
looks like this happens daily now: https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/actions/runs/3440015152/jobs/5737978936 |
When deleting a job in the test, the job does not necessarily terminate immediately, so wait for a log entries from the job before checking the jobs table. Fixed timescale#4859
When deleting a job in the test, the job does not necessarily terminate immediately, so wait for a log entries from the job before checking the jobs table. Fixed timescale#4859
When deleting a job in the test, the job does not necessarily terminate immediately, so wait for a log entries from the job before checking the jobs table. Fixed #4859
When deleting a job in the test, the job does not necessarily terminate immediately, so wait for a log entries from the job before checking the jobs table. Fixed #4859
Which test is flaky?
bgw_db_scheduler_fixed
Since when has the test been flaky?
October 20, 2022
Link to the failed test run
https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/actions/runs/3287871530/jobs/5417535202
https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/actions/runs/3289398600/jobs/5420879404
https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/actions/runs/3295874767/jobs/5434885747
Log output
Reason for flakiness
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: