Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACE-CWT-PROOF-OF-POSSESSION replaces OAUTH-POP-KEY-DISTRIBUTION #413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2017
Merged

ACE-CWT-PROOF-OF-POSSESSION replaces OAUTH-POP-KEY-DISTRIBUTION #413

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2017

Conversation

vivienlacourba
Copy link
Contributor

The IETF RTCWeb WG chairs indicated to the W3C WebRTC WG chairs that the "OAUTH-POP-KEY-DISTRIBUTION" [1] draft (now marked as "expired Internet-Draft / no longer active" ) was being replaced by the "ACE-CWT-PROOF-OF-POSSESSION" [2].

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession/

@dontcallmedom @fluffy @stefhak @aboba @alvestrand

The IETF RTCWeb WG chairs indicated to the W3C WebRTC WG that the "OAUTH-POP-KEY-DISTRIBUTION" [1] draft was being replaced by the "ACE-CWT-PROOF-OF-POSSESSION" [2].

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession/
@tobie
Copy link
Owner

tobie commented Oct 23, 2017

Thanks for your contribution!

A new version of Specref updated with these changes should auto-deploy within minutes. You can search www.specref.org to check for it.

Don't hesitate to comment back here if you can't find your changes within 10 minutes; it's a sign something is off and I'll immediately look into it. Thanks!

Specref loosely follows the process described in The Pull Request Hack. You've thus been granted commit access to the repo.

Please read-up on how to make manual changes, get non-trivial changes reviewed by someone (I'm sure you'll be a good judge of when that's necessary) and feel free to ask if something's unclear.

Thanks again!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants