-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 726
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pass through max_level_hint in reload::Layer #2204
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merged
1 task
hawkw
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good to me!
Comment on lines
+150
to
+152
assert_eq!(LevelFilter::current(), LevelFilter::INFO); | ||
handle.reload(Filter::Two).expect("should reload"); | ||
assert_eq!(LevelFilter::current(), LevelFilter::DEBUG); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
slight pref for having a separate test for max level hinting, but 🤷♀️ i don't care that much
kmahar
pushed a commit
to kmahar/tracing
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2022
## Motivation When using a `reload` layer, the fast-path current level check doesn't work, as the `max_level_hint` is just `None`, which `rebuild_interest` interprets as `TRACE` ## Solution Pass through to the underlying layer/filter. On poisons, when already panicking, just return `None`
hawkw
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2022
## Motivation When using a `reload` layer, the fast-path current level check doesn't work, as the `max_level_hint` is just `None`, which `rebuild_interest` interprets as `TRACE` ## Solution Pass through to the underlying layer/filter. On poisons, when already panicking, just return `None`
hawkw
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2022
## Motivation When using a `reload` layer, the fast-path current level check doesn't work, as the `max_level_hint` is just `None`, which `rebuild_interest` interprets as `TRACE` ## Solution Pass through to the underlying layer/filter. On poisons, when already panicking, just return `None`
hawkw
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2022
## Motivation When using a `reload` layer, the fast-path current level check doesn't work, as the `max_level_hint` is just `None`, which `rebuild_interest` interprets as `TRACE` ## Solution Pass through to the underlying layer/filter. On poisons, when already panicking, just return `None`
hawkw
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2022
# 0.3.15 (Jul 20, 2022) This release fixes a bug where the `reload` layer would fail to pass through `max_level_hint` to the underlying layer, potentially breaking filtering. ### Fixed - **reload**: pass through `max_level_hint` to the inner `Layer` ([#2204]) Thanks to @guswynn for contributing to this release! [#2204]: #2204
hawkw
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2022
# 0.3.15 (Jul 20, 2022) This release fixes a bug where the `reload` layer would fail to pass through `max_level_hint` to the underlying layer, potentially breaking filtering. ### Fixed - **reload**: pass through `max_level_hint` to the inner `Layer` ([#2204]) Thanks to @guswynn for contributing to this release! [#2204]: #2204
kaffarell
pushed a commit
to kaffarell/tracing
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2024
## Motivation When using a `reload` layer, the fast-path current level check doesn't work, as the `max_level_hint` is just `None`, which `rebuild_interest` interprets as `TRACE` ## Solution Pass through to the underlying layer/filter. On poisons, when already panicking, just return `None`
kaffarell
pushed a commit
to kaffarell/tracing
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2024
# 0.3.15 (Jul 20, 2022) This release fixes a bug where the `reload` layer would fail to pass through `max_level_hint` to the underlying layer, potentially breaking filtering. ### Fixed - **reload**: pass through `max_level_hint` to the inner `Layer` ([tokio-rs#2204]) Thanks to @guswynn for contributing to this release! [tokio-rs#2204]: tokio-rs#2204
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
When using a
reload
layer, the fast-path current level check doesn't work, as themax_level_hint
is justNone
, whichrebuild_interest
interprets asTRACE
Solution
Pass through to the underlying layer/filter. On poisons, when already panicking, just return
None