Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow setting event names in macros. #2699

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

twitchax
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

The motivation is #1426. Currently, event names are set to a default value of event file:line, which (1) doesn't allow for customization, and (2) prevents events from working for some opentelemetry endpoints (they often use the event name exception to designate something like a panic).

Solution

Went through the event macros, and added new parameterization that allows for setting the name. In addition, added some comments, and reordering, to make life a bit better for the next person that comes along to edit those macros. Finally, added tests for the macro expansion alongside the existing tests with a reasonable amount of coverage (though, admittedly, more could be added for all of the macro invocation types).

Copy link
Member

@hawkw hawkw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The macro and test changes look good to me --- thank you for working on this! However, I notice that the new macro syntax is not documented anywhere. Can we add it to the the RustDoc comments on the individual event macros, and also mention it in the top-level "using the macros" section in the lib.rs docs? It would be nice to include examples. Thank you!

@twitchax
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will do. Likely will get to this tonight (PDT).

Copy link
Member

@hawkw hawkw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the docs here describe what can be overridden, and they don't mention event names:
https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing/pull/2699/files#diff-ea2f30245316830135d5b43541a7be0930b4bfded454b5396509770c39a59c7cL216-L220

can we also update this paragraph?

@@ -421,6 +421,7 @@
//! // - "message", with the value "the answer to the ultimate question of life, the
//! // universe, and everything is 42."
//! event!(
//! name: "life",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this example has a block comment explaining the span that will be recorded, and it doesn't mention the overridden name:
https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing/pull/2699/files#diff-ea2f30245316830135d5b43541a7be0930b4bfded454b5396509770c39a59c7cR417-R422

can we either update that comment, or remove the overridden name from this example?

my preference would probably be to add new examples for overriding event names, rather than including them in existing examples. this example is intended to demonstrate the way that the message field is generated, and overriding the name is not related to message generation. my preference would be to not include things not directly related to the specific thing being demonstrated, so that the user doesn't think they're related...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, makes sense.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great, thanks!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, addressed!

@twitchax
Copy link
Contributor Author

twitchax commented Sep 5, 2023

@hawkw, I don't necessarily want to re-do, but how do you feel about the name: convention? If the plan is for this to go into 0.2.0+, maybe now would be a good time to make name required on event! just as it is on span!?

The current change is fine with me, but just wanted to check that this convention aligns well with your wishes.

@hawkw
Copy link
Member

hawkw commented Sep 5, 2023

@hawkw, I don't necessarily want to re-do, but how do you feel about the name: convention? If the plan is for this to go into 0.2.0+, maybe now would be a good time to make name required on event! just as it is on span!?

hmm, my preference is for events to not require a name...i feel like users often just want to record a single field value or an unstructured textual log message, and having to think up a name for each event seems like an extra speed bump to just recording the piece of data you want. i agree that this is somewhat inconsistent with how spans are recorded, though, and i'm open to being convinced otherwise.

i feel like in the common case, an event will have a textual message, and the name will likely end up duplicating some or all of that text. i wonder if (as a separate change), we might want to change the default generated name to be the format string for the textual message, if there is a format string. that way, the default name is maybe a bit more useful than the source location.

in any case, this PR is definitely going to be backported to v0.1.x, so i'd like to continue with the non-breaking change so we can release this in v0.1.x soon. we could reconsider the conventions on v0.2.x after this merges.

@twitchax
Copy link
Contributor Author

twitchax commented Sep 5, 2023

Cool: makes sense. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't pushing something that would make future plans harder. I agree that it does seem to make sense to not require name, which means this change is likely a good fit for that continued future.

Copy link
Member

@hawkw hawkw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a couple last docs nits, but once those are addressed, this looks good to me!

tracing/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tracing/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
twitchax and others added 2 commits September 5, 2023 12:51
Co-authored-by: Eliza Weisman <eliza@buoyant.io>
Co-authored-by: Eliza Weisman <eliza@buoyant.io>
@hawkw hawkw enabled auto-merge (squash) September 5, 2023 19:55
@hawkw hawkw merged commit c573651 into tokio-rs:master Sep 5, 2023
56 checks passed
hawkw added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2023
@twitchax twitchax deleted the twitchax/event_name branch September 6, 2023 06:41
davidbarsky pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2023
## Motivation

The motivation is #1426.  Currently, event names are set to a default
value of `event file:line`, which (1) doesn't allow for customization,
and (2) prevents events from working for some opentelemetry endpoints
(they often use the event name `exception` to designate something like a
panic).

## Solution

Went through the event macros, and added new parameterization that
allows for setting the `name`.  In addition, added some comments, and
reordering, to make life a bit better for the next person that comes
along to edit those macros.  Finally, added tests for the macro
expansion alongside the existing tests with a reasonable amount of
coverage (though, admittedly, more could be added for all of the macro
invocation types

Fixes #1426
davidbarsky pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
## Motivation

The motivation is #1426.  Currently, event names are set to a default
value of `event file:line`, which (1) doesn't allow for customization,
and (2) prevents events from working for some opentelemetry endpoints
(they often use the event name `exception` to designate something like a
panic).

## Solution

Went through the event macros, and added new parameterization that
allows for setting the `name`.  In addition, added some comments, and
reordering, to make life a bit better for the next person that comes
along to edit those macros.  Finally, added tests for the macro
expansion alongside the existing tests with a reasonable amount of
coverage (though, admittedly, more could be added for all of the macro
invocation types

Fixes #1426
davidbarsky pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
## Motivation

The motivation is #1426.  Currently, event names are set to a default
value of `event file:line`, which (1) doesn't allow for customization,
and (2) prevents events from working for some opentelemetry endpoints
(they often use the event name `exception` to designate something like a
panic).

## Solution

Went through the event macros, and added new parameterization that
allows for setting the `name`.  In addition, added some comments, and
reordering, to make life a bit better for the next person that comes
along to edit those macros.  Finally, added tests for the macro
expansion alongside the existing tests with a reasonable amount of
coverage (though, admittedly, more could be added for all of the macro
invocation types

Fixes #1426
davidbarsky pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
## Motivation

The motivation is #1426.  Currently, event names are set to a default
value of `event file:line`, which (1) doesn't allow for customization,
and (2) prevents events from working for some opentelemetry endpoints
(they often use the event name `exception` to designate something like a
panic).

## Solution

Went through the event macros, and added new parameterization that
allows for setting the `name`.  In addition, added some comments, and
reordering, to make life a bit better for the next person that comes
along to edit those macros.  Finally, added tests for the macro
expansion alongside the existing tests with a reasonable amount of
coverage (though, admittedly, more could be added for all of the macro
invocation types

Fixes #1426
davidbarsky pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
## Motivation

The motivation is #1426.  Currently, event names are set to a default
value of `event file:line`, which (1) doesn't allow for customization,
and (2) prevents events from working for some opentelemetry endpoints
(they often use the event name `exception` to designate something like a
panic).

## Solution

Went through the event macros, and added new parameterization that
allows for setting the `name`.  In addition, added some comments, and
reordering, to make life a bit better for the next person that comes
along to edit those macros.  Finally, added tests for the macro
expansion alongside the existing tests with a reasonable amount of
coverage (though, admittedly, more could be added for all of the macro
invocation types

Fixes #1426
davidbarsky pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
## Motivation

The motivation is #1426.  Currently, event names are set to a default
value of `event file:line`, which (1) doesn't allow for customization,
and (2) prevents events from working for some opentelemetry endpoints
(they often use the event name `exception` to designate something like a
panic).

## Solution

Went through the event macros, and added new parameterization that
allows for setting the `name`.  In addition, added some comments, and
reordering, to make life a bit better for the next person that comes
along to edit those macros.  Finally, added tests for the macro
expansion alongside the existing tests with a reasonable amount of
coverage (though, admittedly, more could be added for all of the macro
invocation types

Fixes #1426
hawkw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2023
## Motivation

The motivation is #1426.  Currently, event names are set to a default
value of `event file:line`, which (1) doesn't allow for customization,
and (2) prevents events from working for some opentelemetry endpoints
(they often use the event name `exception` to designate something like a
panic).

## Solution

Went through the event macros, and added new parameterization that
allows for setting the `name`.  In addition, added some comments, and
reordering, to make life a bit better for the next person that comes
along to edit those macros.  Finally, added tests for the macro
expansion alongside the existing tests with a reasonable amount of
coverage (though, admittedly, more could be added for all of the macro
invocation types

Fixes #1426
hawkw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
# 0.1.39 (October 12, 2023)

This release adds several additional features to the `tracing` macros.
In addition, it updates the `tracing-core` dependency to
[v0.1.32][core-0.1.32] and the `tracing-attributes` dependency to
[v0.1.27][attrs-0.1.27].

### Added

- Allow constant field names in macros ([#2617])
- Allow setting event names in macros ([#2699])
- **core**: Allow `ValueSet`s of any length ([#2508])

### Changed

- `tracing-attributes`: updated to [0.1.27][attrs-0.1.27]
- `tracing-core`: updated to [0.1.32][core-0.1.32]
- **attributes**: Bump minimum version of proc-macro2 to 1.0.60
  ([#2732])
-  **attributes**: Generate less dead code for async block return type
   hint ([#2709])

### Fixed

- Use fully qualified names in macros for items exported from std
  prelude ([#2621], [#2757])
- **attributes**: Allow [`clippy::let_with_type_underscore`] in
  macro-generated code ([#2609])
- **attributes**: Allow `unknown_lints` in macro-generated code
  ([#2626])
- **attributes**: Fix a compilation error in `#[instrument]` when the
  `"log"` feature is enabled ([#2599])

### Documented

- Add `axum-insights` to relevant crates. ([#2713])
- Fix link to RAI pattern crate documentation ([#2612])
- Fix docs typos and warnings ([#2581])
- Add `clippy-tracing` to related crates ([#2628])
- Add `tracing-cloudwatch` to related crates ([#2667])
- Fix deadlink to `tracing-etw` repo ([#2602])

[#2617]: #2617
[#2699]: #2699
[#2508]: #2508
[#2621]: #2621
[#2713]: #2713
[#2581]: #2581
[#2628]: #2628
[#2667]: #2667
[#2602]: #2602
[#2626]: #2626
[#2757]: #2757
[#2732]: #2732
[#2709]: #2709
[#2599]: #2599
[`let_with_type_underscore`]: http://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/rust-1.70.0/index.html#let_with_type_underscore
[attrs-0.1.27]:
    https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing/releases/tag/tracing-attributes-0.1.27
[core-0.1.32]:
    https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing/releases/tag/tracing-core-0.1.32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants