enabled memmap in tiff reader to improve sino read performance #102
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dgursoy
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2015
enabled memmap in tiff reader to improve sino read performance
carterbox
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2018
enabled memmap in tiff reader to improve sino read performance Former-commit-id: 791bf84
carterbox
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2018
enabled memmap in tiff reader to improve sino read performance Former-commit-id: 791bf84
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
memmap=True enables memory-mapped file. These files are used for accessing small segments of large files on disk, without reading the entire file into memory. More at http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.memmap.html
read test on APS 1-ID tiff files:
read of 1801 x (2kx2k): 15s (memmap=False) vs 9s (memmap=True)
read of 1801 x (100x2k): 11s (memmap=False) vs 2s (memmap=True)